Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SHACL - sh:PropertyShape with target #1362

Closed
hmottestad opened this issue Mar 25, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

SHACL - sh:PropertyShape with target #1362

hmottestad opened this issue Mar 25, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees
@hmottestad
Labels
📦 SHACL affects the SHACL validator

Comments

@hmottestad
Copy link
Contributor

eg.

ex:s1 a sh:PropertyShape ;
  sh:targetNode ex:i ;
  sh:path ex:message ;
  sh:minCount 0 ;
  sh:uniqueLang "1"^^xsd:boolean .

Not sure how to handle this. Was thinking SPARQL.
@hmottestad hmottestad added the 📦 SHACL affects the SHACL validator label Mar 25, 2019
@hmottestad hmottestad added this to the 3.0 milestone Mar 25, 2019
@hmottestad hmottestad self-assigned this Mar 25, 2019
hmottestad added a commit to eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j-storage that referenced this issue Mar 25, 2019
@hmottestad
eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1362 normalised targets with SPARQL
5910d68 
Signed-off-by: Håvard Ottestad <[email protected]>
hmottestad added a commit to eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j-storage that referenced this issue Mar 25, 2019
@hmottestad
eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1362 normalised targets with SPARQL
f26105c 
Signed-off-by: Håvard Ottestad <[email protected]>
@hmottestad hmottestad mentioned this issue Mar 25, 2019
Merged
hmottestad added a commit to eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j-storage that referenced this issue Mar 25, 2019
@hmottestad
eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1362 normalised targets with SPARQL
9d60014 
Signed-off-by: Håvard Ottestad <[email protected]>
@hmottestad
Copy link
Contributor Author

hmottestad commented Mar 25, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Should really handle this in Java code rather than with SPARQL! For performance.

hmottestad added a commit to eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j-storage that referenced this issue Mar 25, 2019
@hmottestad
Merge branch 'develop' into feature/101_shacl_w3c_tests
3bb7afd 
* develop:
  eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1362 normalised targets with SPARQL

Signed-off-by: Håvard Ottestad <[email protected]>
hmottestad added a commit to eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j-storage that referenced this issue Apr 3, 2019
@hmottestad
Merge branch 'develop' into issues/1350_shacl_new_memory_store
6ff1315 
* develop: (35 commits)
  fixes eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1377 and fixes eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1376
  eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1290 diff shapes and implement equals/hashcode
  eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1374 log unsupported shacl features with test
  eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1290 fixed typo and reformat
  eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1290 added benchmakr
  eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1290 multithreaded test
  eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1290 detect deadlock when modifying shapes in single thread from multiple connections
  eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1290 deadlock detection
  cleanup
  #211 read/write lock
  formatter
  eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1290 locking and isolation
  formatter
  eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1290 handle concurrency better
  eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1290 initial implementation
  eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1290 tests
  Use commons-lang3 and commons-text instead of commons-lang Signed-off-by:Bart Hanssens <[email protected]>
  eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1362 normalised targets with SPARQL
  eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1359 bug fix and benchmark
  eclipse-rdf4j/rdf4j#1359 some documentation
  ...

Signed-off-by: Håvard Ottestad <[email protected]>

# Conflicts:
#	shacl/src/main/java/org/eclipse/rdf4j/sail/shacl/ShaclSailConnection.java
@abrokenjester abrokenjester modified the milestones: 3.0.0, 3.1.0 Aug 22, 2019
@abrokenjester abrokenjester modified the milestones: 3.1.0, 3.2.0 Feb 3, 2020
@hmottestad hmottestad removed this from the 3.2.0 milestone Feb 28, 2020
@danaivach danaivach mentioned this issue Sep 29, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@hmottestad hmottestad

Labels
📦 SHACL affects the SHACL validator
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@abrokenjester @hmottestad