Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 564420 move HC condition miner to new interfaces #259

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2020
Merged

Conversation

eparovyshnaya
Copy link
Contributor

  • add contract test for a ConditionTransport implementation
  • deprecate previous version of ConditionTransport

Signed-off-by: elena.parovyshnaya [email protected]

 - add contract test for a ConditionTransport implementation
 - deprecate previous version of ConditionTransport

Signed-off-by: elena.parovyshnaya <[email protected]>
@eparovyshnaya eparovyshnaya requested a review from ruspl-afed June 21, 2020 07:49
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 21, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #259 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #259      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   11.66%   11.65%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         593      594       +1     
  Lines       15176    15193      +17     
  Branches     1171     1172       +1     
==========================================
  Hits         1770     1770              
- Misses      13360    13377      +17     
  Partials       46       46              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ditions/mining/ConditionTransportContractTest.java 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9d04b5c...d4b1f44. Read the comment docs.

@eparovyshnaya eparovyshnaya merged commit bd42095 into master Jun 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants