Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove pack200 from Passage releng #1116 #1117

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 21, 2022
Merged

Conversation

ruspl-afed
Copy link
Contributor

Removed pack200 plugins from production profile

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fedorov [email protected]

Removed pack200 plugins from production profile

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fedorov <[email protected]>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 21, 2022

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@96683f5). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #1117   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   33.21%           
  Complexity        ?      356           
=========================================
  Files             ?     1161           
  Lines             ?    25699           
  Branches          ?     1588           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     8535           
  Misses            ?    16659           
  Partials          ?      505           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@ruspl-afed
Copy link
Contributor Author

Works fine with "production" profile, just checked it for Jenkins "passage-stable" configuration @eparovyshnaya

@eparovyshnaya eparovyshnaya merged commit 942147e into master Aug 21, 2022
@ruspl-afed ruspl-afed deleted the 1116_remove_pack200 branch August 21, 2022 08:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants