Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to log4j 2.17.1 #1018 #1019

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 2, 2022
Merged

Switch to log4j 2.17.1 #1018 #1019

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 2, 2022

Conversation

ruspl-afed
Copy link
Contributor

Use Orbit I20220131095416
Increase required version of log4j to 2.17.1
Add log4j to lic.equinox feature

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fedorov [email protected]

Use Orbit I20220131095416
Increase required version of log4j to 2.17.1
Add log4j to lic.equinox feature

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fedorov <[email protected]>
Bump version for lic.jetty

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fedorov <[email protected]>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 2, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1019 (951ab76) into master (182322a) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #1019   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     33.46%   33.46%           
  Complexity      346      346           
=========================================
  Files          1131     1131           
  Lines         25043    25043           
  Branches       1550     1550           
=========================================
+ Hits           8380     8381    +1     
+ Misses        16174    16173    -1     
  Partials        489      489           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...rg/eclipse/passage/lic/bc/BcResidentSecretKey.java 95.65% <0.00%> (+4.34%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 182322a...951ab76. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants