sanity.openjdk jdk11 zlinux failures in sun/nio/cs testing #9009
Comments
|
Started a 1x grinder https://ci.eclipse.org/openj9/job/Grinder/718/ - passed on ub16-390-3 |
|
2x grinders https://ci.eclipse.org/openj9/job/Grinder/720 ub16-390-1 - passed 1x on rh7-390-4 https://ci.eclipse.org/openj9/job/Grinder/723/ - passed |
|
Thought this could be related to #8992 but that looks to be a compile time crash and this is a runtime exception, so likely not related. @VermaSh could you take a look at this one given it is in the area related to Strings and we just merged the VSTRS fixes a few days ago. It could be related to that change. |
Provided instructions via PM on Slack |
|
Grinder shows a 1/30 failure rate: @VermaSh any updates? |
|
@fjeremic Failures in that grinder seem to be agent related |
|
@VermaSh I don't think so. Look at the console output and search for "PASSED: 0 FAILED: 1", there is clearly a crash here which looks similar to the original one: There are several more there with a final failure of a crash in GC due to what looks like a corrupt object. |
|
ah dang, I thought Test Results section would show errors. Can you please launch a grinder using |
|
There used to be a way to build personal builds off of branches, but I no longer see it here: That list is absolutely massive. I tried kicking off a "Build_Personal" however it is unintuitive what you actually have to specify in those textboxes: @pshipton do you might know of an easy way to get a build against the above repos/branches? We need to get a build so we can launch a grinder against it. |
|
@fjeremic it doesn't have the best name, but the "personal build" job you are looking for is https://ci.eclipse.org/openj9/view/Pipelines/job/Pipeline-Release-Build/ |
|
Build with the requested branches: Grinder against it: |
|
Previous grinder failed 4/60, so failure rate is roughly 1/15. It looks like we fail only with the NPE, and not the other failures. I suspect we may be looking at different issues here. It is possible the NPE issue is not related to the other two exceptions. Regardless we need to keep tracking. |
|
@fjeremic Thanks for launching the grinder. Can you launch one last grinder without my initial VSTRS changes |
|
Unfortunately I can't specify individual commits, the pipeline only lets me specify branches. Can you create a new branch which has |
|
no worries. |
|
@VermaSh the branches now result in a build failure. Likely a mismatch between OMR and OpenJ9: |
|
Fixed the issue, |
|
Build with the requested branches: Grinder against it: |
|
A minor update: |
|
Update: List 1: Test failures when running jdk_nio_0 grinder locally on |
|
I am unable to get a log or a core dump for Going to try getting a log and core file for Test output: |
|
Grinder on the latest nightly to see if this problem is still reproducible: |
|
I am having some trouble reproducing the failure with any additional options, I have tried running the tests via the TKG test infrastructure, running them manually using the cmd grinder uses and through Bellow are the commands that I have used to try to reproduce the failure /home/jenkins/sverma/jdk11_images_with_my_changes/jdk/bin/java \
-Dtest.vm.opts='-ea -esa -Xmx512m -Xjit:count=0,disableasynccompilation' \
-Dtest.tool.vm.opts='-J-ea -J-esa -J-Xmx512m' \
-Dtest.compiler.opts= \
-Dtest.java.opts= \
-Dtest.jdk=/home/jenkins/sverma/jdk11_images_with_my_changes/jdk \
-Dcompile.jdk=/home/jenkins/sverma/jdk11_images_with_my_changes/jdk \
-Dtest.timeout.factor=8.0 \
-Dtest.nativepath=/home/jenkins/sverma/jdk11_images_with_my_changes/test/jdk/jtreg/native \
-Dtest.root=/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/openjdk/openjdk-jdk/test/jdk \
-Dtest.name=sun/nio/cs/FindDecoderBugs.java \
-Dtest.file=/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/openjdk/openjdk-jdk/test/jdk/sun/nio/cs/FindDecoderBugs.java \
-Dtest.src=/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/openjdk/openjdk-jdk/test/jdk/sun/nio/cs \
-Dtest.src.path=/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/openjdk/openjdk-jdk/test/jdk/sun/nio/cs:/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/openjdk/openjdk-jdk/test/lib \
-Dtest.classes=$compiled_tests/sun/nio/cs/FindDecoderBugs.d \
-Dtest.class.path=$compiled_tests/sun/nio/cs/FindDecoderBugs.d:$compiled_tests/test/lib \
-Dtest.class.path.prefix=$compiled_tests/sun/nio/cs/FindDecoderBugs.d:/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/openjdk/openjdk-jdk/test/jdk/sun/nio/cs:$compiled_tests/test/lib \
-Dseed=-8710075718699692142 \
-classpath $compiled_tests/sun/nio/cs/FindDecoderBugs.d:/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/openjdk/openjdk-jdk/test/jdk/sun/nio/cs:$compiled_tests/test/lib:/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/openjdk/openjdk-jdk/test/lib:/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/test-results/openjdk/jtreg/lib/javatest.jar:/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/test-results/openjdk/jtreg/lib/jtreg.jar \
FindDecoderBugs"/home/jenkins/sverma/jdk11_images_with_my_changes/jdk/bin/java" -Xmx512m \
-jar "/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/test-results/openjdk/jtreg/lib/jtreg.jar" \
-agentvm -a -ea -esa -v:fail,error,time,nopass -retain:fail,error,*.dmp,javacore.*,heapdump.*,*.trc \
-ignore:quiet -timeoutFactor:8 -xml:verify -concurrency:2 \
-nativepath:"/home/jenkins/sverma/jdk11_images_with_my_changes/test/jdk/jtreg/native" -vmoptions:"-Xmx512m " \
-w ""/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/TKG/../TKG/test_output_15909610427730/jdk_nio_0"/work" \
-r "/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/test-results/openjdk/report" \
-jdk:"/home/jenkins/sverma/jdk11_images_with_my_changes/jdk" \
-exclude:"/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/TKG/../openjdk/openjdk-jdk/test/jdk/ProblemList.txt" \
-exclude:"/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/test-results/openjdk/ProblemList_openjdk11-openj9.txt" \
"/home/jenkins/sverma/openjdk-tests/TKG/../openjdk/openjdk-jdk/test/jdk:jdk_nio"; |
|
Quick update: |
|
re: #9009 (comment) yes based on how many times people ask about it, I suppose someone should really propose a fix to openjdk jtreg framework to print that its moved the files. |
|
Quick update: |
https://ci.eclipse.org/openj9/job/Test_openjdk11_j9_sanity.openjdk_s390x_linux_Nightly/13/
rh7-390-4 - history shows the test has passed on this machine before
sun/nio/cs/FindDecoderBugs.java.FindDecoderBugs | 19 sec | 1
sun/nio/cs/SurrogateGB18030Test.java.SurrogateGB18030Test | 0.32 sec | 1
sun/nio/cs/SurrogateTestEUCTW.java.SurrogateTestEUCTW | 67 ms | 1
sun/nio/cs/SurrogateTestHKSCS.java.SurrogateTestHKSCS | 0.14 sec | 1
sun/nio/cs/Test4206507.java.Test4206507 | 90 ms | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestConverterDroppedCharacters.java.TestConverterDroppedCharacters | 0.28 sec | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestCp834_SBCS.java.TestCp834_SBCS | 0.38 sec | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestEBCDICLineFeed.java.TestEBCDICLineFeed | 88 ms | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestEUC_TW.java.TestEUC_TW | 0.3 sec | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestGB18030.java.TestGB18030 | 88 ms | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestHKSCS.java.TestHKSCS | 98 ms | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestIBMBugs.java.TestIBMBugs | 0.1 sec | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestISO2022CNDecoder.java.TestISO2022CNDecoder | 0.13 sec | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestISO2022JP.java.TestISO2022JP | 0.13 sec | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestISO2022JPEncoder.java.TestISO2022JPEncoder | 79 ms | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestISO2022JPSubBytes.java.TestISO2022JPSubBytes | 89 ms | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestIllegalSJIS.java.TestIllegalSJIS | 84 ms | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestJIS0208Decoder.java.TestJIS0208Decoder | 85 ms | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestJIS0212Decoder.java.TestJIS0212Decoder | 72 ms | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestMS5022X.java.TestMS5022X | 97 ms | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestMiscEUC_JP.java.TestMiscEUC_JP | 85 ms | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestSJIS0213.java.TestSJIS0213 | 89 ms | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestSJIS0213_SM.java.TestSJIS0213_SM | 79 ms | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestCp93xSISO.java.TestCp93xSISO | 69 ms | 1
sun/nio/cs/TestIllegalISO2022Esc.java.TestIllegalISO2022Esc | 91 ms | 1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: