Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[enhancement] Standard Digital Twin Adapter #124

Closed
3 tasks
wilyle opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #138
Closed
3 tasks

[enhancement] Standard Digital Twin Adapter #124

wilyle opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #138
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@wilyle
Copy link
Contributor

wilyle commented Feb 9, 2024

Description

The current implementation of Freyja requires users to write rust code to integrate. This is often unnecessary, as many scenarios will have a similar set of requirements and don't need the advanced capabilities that come with the pluggable adapter system. It also presents a minor blocker when integrating with non-rust components, as it still requires rust code. A "standard" adapter should be implemented so that users can more easily integrate with Freyja in basic scenarios without having to write code.

For this particular adapter, the Ibeji interface should be considered the "standard" interface for a digital twin service

Acceptance criteria

  • The "standard" digital twin adapter supports a well-known interface
  • The "standard" digital twin adapter requires only configuration to use, and no additional code
  • Ibeji integration should be achieved through the use of the "standard" adapter
@wilyle wilyle added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 9, 2024
wilyle added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2024
Refactors the Ibeji and Chariott adapters to use them as standard adapters.

Also includes a minor improvement to the spellcheck script to make identifying errors in workflow runs easier.

Fixes #124
@wilyle wilyle self-assigned this Mar 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant