-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 245
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: remove TransferProcess
connectorId
#3396
Comments
Hi @ndr-brt Can I take over this issue? T |
sure! I just assigned it to you. thanks |
Hi I have removed from the classes the connectorId |
@magork the issued was assigned to @salmansharifov , why don't sync with him first? |
Hi This is my first time when I contribute. I am expecting that what I have done is not enough and still should do further changes. Hi @salmansharifov could we connect? |
As I wrote in the PR, I suggest to read through the CONTRIBUTING guide, as a rule of thumb this is something that should be done before starting contributing to every project. |
Hi @magork , if you have already working branch, you can create pr. |
Hi @salmansharifov Sorry to answer late but I where on a trip and I didn't have my laptop. |
This issue is stale because it has been open for 28 days with no activity. |
Hey @salmansharifov are you gonna work on it? otherwise I will remove the assignment |
This issue is stale because it has been open for 28 days with no activity. |
* feat: add PrefixMonitor (#3510) * refactor: remove connector id (#3396) * fix: add missing "since" * fix: add missing table name in drop column statement * fix: remove connector id from tests * refactor: add deprecated warning to swagger api * fix: remove wrong change * fix: remove connector_id from schema creation in schema.sql
Feature Request
Currently, both
TransferRequest
andDataRequest
objects contain thisconnectorId
that's actually not used by anyone, it's not needed, because the counter-party id it's stored in theContractAgreement
, soconnectorId
can be removedWhich Areas Would Be Affected?
transfer process
Why Is the Feature Desired?
cleanup
Solution Proposal
If possible, provide a (brief!) solution proposal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: