Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{lib}[foss/2021b] PyTables v3.8.0 w/ Python 3.9.6 #17550

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sassy-crick
Copy link
Collaborator

@sassy-crick sassy-crick commented Mar 16, 2023

…s-3.8.0-fix-libs.patch, py-blosc2-2.0.0-numpylib.patch
sassy-crick pushed a commit to sassy-crick/easybuild-easyconfigs that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@casparvl casparvl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see quite a few differences with PyTables-3.6.1-foss-2021a.eb. I'm sure you made them with good reason, but maybe you can elaborate a bit, or at least confirm that they were different on purpose. Differences I spotted:

  • PyTables-3.6.1 used toolchainopts = {'usempi': True}
  • PyTables-3.6.1 listed far fewer dependencies
  • None of the items (except PyTables itself) in the exts_list was present in PyTables-3.6.1

@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Apr 11, 2023
@boegel boegel added this to the 4.x milestone Apr 11, 2023
@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Apr 11, 2023
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Apr 11, 2023

@sassy-crick This also disagrees a bit with the easyconfig for PyTables 3.8.0 with foss/2022a, see #17143

@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Mar 15, 2024
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Mar 15, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=17550 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_17550 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13113

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1999113614 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/d5e2051e7b3abc33e1b16855f0c5895d for a full test report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants