Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{data}[foss/2022a] PyTables v3.8.0 w/ Python 3.10.4 #17018

Closed

Conversation

iotaka
Copy link
Contributor

@iotaka iotaka commented Dec 27, 2022

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@iotaka: Tests failed in GitHub Actions, see https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/actions/runs/3822524232
Output from first failing test suite run:

FAIL: test__parse_easyconfig_PyTables-3.8.0-foss-2022a.eb (test.easyconfigs.easyconfigs.EasyConfigTest)
Test for easyconfig PyTables-3.8.0-foss-2022a.eb
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "test/easyconfigs/easyconfigs.py", line 1510, in innertest
    template_easyconfig_test(self, spec_path)
  File "test/easyconfigs/easyconfigs.py", line 1404, in template_easyconfig_test
    self.assertTrue(os.path.isfile(ext_patch_full), msg)
AssertionError: Patch file /home/runner/work/easybuild-easyconfigs/easybuild-easyconfigs/easybuild/easyconfigs/p/PyTables/PyTables-3.8.0-fix-libs.patch is available for PyTables-3.8.0-foss-2022a.eb

======================================================================
FAIL: test_pr_python_packages (test.easyconfigs.easyconfigs.EasyConfigTest)
Several checks for easyconfigs that install (bundles of) Python packages.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "test/easyconfigs/easyconfigs.py", line 1069, in test_pr_python_packages
    self.fail('\n'.join(failing_checks))
AssertionError: '*download_dep_fail' should not be set in PyTables-3.8.0-foss-2022a.eb since PythonBundle easyblock is used

======================================================================
FAIL: test_style_conformance (test.easyconfigs.styletests.StyleTest)
Check the easyconfigs for style
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "test/easyconfigs/styletests.py", line 68, in test_style_conformance
    self.assertEqual(result, 0, error_msg)
  File "/opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/2.7.18/x64/lib/python2.7/site-packages/easybuild/base/testing.py", line 116, in assertEqual
    raise AssertionError("%s:\nDIFF%s:\n%s" % (msg, limit, ''.join(diff[:self.ASSERT_MAX_DIFF])))
AssertionError: There shouldn't be any code style errors (and/or warnings), found 3:
/home/runner/work/easybuild-easyconfigs/easybuild-easyconfigs/easybuild/easyconfigs/p/PyTables/PyTables-3.8.0-foss-2022a.eb:46:17: E126 continuation line over-indented for hanging indent
/home/runner/work/easybuild-easyconfigs/easybuild-easyconfigs/easybuild/easyconfigs/p/PyTables/PyTables-3.8.0-foss-2022a.eb:47:10: E121 continuation line under-indented for hanging indent
/home/runner/work/easybuild-easyconfigs/easybuild-easyconfigs/easybuild/easyconfigs/p/PyTables/PyTables-3.8.0-foss-2022a.eb:51:17: E126 continuation line over-indented for hanging indent

: 3 != 0:
DIFF:
- 3

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 16096 tests in 642.427s

FAILED (failures=3)
ERROR: Not all tests were successful

bleep, bloop, I'm just a bot (boegelbot v20200716.01)
Please talk to my owner @boegel if you notice you me acting stupid),
or submit a pull request to https://github.com/boegel/boegelbot fix the problem.

@boegel boegel added the update label Feb 15, 2023
@boegel boegel added this to the 4.x milestone Feb 15, 2023
@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Feb 15, 2023
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 15, 2023

superseded by #17143, so closing...

@boegel boegel closed this Feb 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants