Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{phys}[foss/2022a] Block v1.5.3-20200525 #16711

Merged

Conversation

lexming
Copy link
Contributor

@lexming lexming commented Nov 23, 2022

(created using eb --new-pr)

Depends on:

@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Nov 30, 2022
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Nov 30, 2022

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegel boegel added this to the 4.x milestone Nov 30, 2022
@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16711 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16711 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 9683

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1331849535 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/aa980e4662f50a4242fc6331e02f2468 for a full test report.

@bogdanoff
Copy link

Actually it happened that StackBlock was referred to as Block 1.5. The released Block 1.5.3 tarball is a slice of the StackBlock repository. At some point I extracted all the releases to https://github.com/bogdanoff/Block/tree/release-1.5 . I believe Block 1.5 was never printed by the code, even PySCF determines the version of Block indirectly: https://github.com/pyscf/dmrgscf/blob/master/pyscf/dmrgscf/dmrgci.py#L1002

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor Author

lexming commented Jan 3, 2023

@bogdanoff thanks a lot for the info, that clarifies the issue with the version of the source code. I'll update this PR to use the correct sources.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jan 10, 2023

@lexming Any updates?

@lexming lexming changed the title {phys}[foss/2022a] Block v1.5.3-20210723 {phys}[foss/2022a] Block v1.5.3-20200525 Jan 17, 2023
@lexming
Copy link
Contributor Author

lexming commented Jan 17, 2023

@boegel fixed in d14524f

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jan 17, 2023

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16711 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16711 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 10014

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1386023052 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/41d10a472747a620aa0c89735e4bb751 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jan 20, 2023

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=16711 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_16711 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 2076

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1398036810 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jan 20, 2023

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3129.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/1555f5ae31a2d7ed786b695837bc67e1 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/5837b08e15a25ea71781896fa501fe3d for a full test report.

@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.7.1?) Jan 20, 2023
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel boegel dismissed branfosj’s stale review January 20, 2023 08:13

version problem has been fixed

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jan 20, 2023

Going in, thanks @lexming!

@boegel boegel merged commit d6aeaaf into easybuilders:develop Jan 20, 2023
@lexming lexming deleted the 20221123103450_new_pr_Block15320210723 branch January 20, 2023 11:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants