Feature/ucte converter #2498
Open
Feature/ucte converter #2498
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…eature/ucte_converter
…eature/ucte_converter
…nged in some case which might be wrong, cf. Line2_DE
…ired_std_type_parameters()
…eature/make_available_required_std_type_params
…eature/ucte_converter
…eature/ucte_converter
- fix breaking commit d8486f6 - fix geodata passing to create_bus
…eature/ucte_converter
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a converter to get pandapower network data from UCTE-DEF (UCTE Data Exchange Format)
The UCTE-DEF is a simple data format for electric transmission systems for the exchange of grid data introduced by the Union for the Co-ordination of Transmission of Electricity (UCTE), the predecessor of the ENTSO-E.
What is included, as well?
required_std_type_parameters(), cf. making available required standard type parameters #2479obj.GetAttributes(a)instead ofobj.GetAttribute(a)new_optimization_model_pandamodels.ipynbMaturity status
I think, it should be complete. Further refactoring can be done if there is ever time for it; as always.
Further remarks
The merge should be done as squash merge, I propose.