Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add scripts to setup and teardown the miniconda version #739

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 16, 2020

Conversation

shankari
Copy link
Contributor

  • schedule tests periodically

This should avoid weird issues caused by bitrotted miniconda versions similar to
e-mission/e-mission-docs#511
or
e-mission/e-mission-docs#513

If such bitrotting happens, we need to upgrade the packages, but at least we will know that we need to, and people won't have unpleasant surprises when they try to install manually. Apparently, some people prefer to install manually
e-mission/e-mission-docs#513

This will allow us to catch bitrotted changes like
e-mission/e-mission-docs#513
or
e-mission/e-mission-docs#511
and make it easier for people who don't want to use docker to install
This should avoid weird issues caused by bitrotted miniconda versions
similar to
e-mission/e-mission-docs#511
or
e-mission/e-mission-docs#513

If such bitrotting happens, we need to upgrade the packages, but at least we
will know that we need to, and people won't have unpleasant surprises when they
try to install manually. Apparently, some people prefer to install manually
e-mission/e-mission-docs#513
So that it goes into all the setup scripts
+ modify all the setup scripts!
@shankari shankari merged commit d9be3b6 into e-mission:master Apr 16, 2020
shankari added a commit to e-mission/e-mission-docs that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2020
jf87 pushed a commit to jf87/e-mission-server that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2021
Add scripts to setup and teardown the miniconda version
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant