Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix some function names in comment #2706

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lencap
Copy link

@lencap lencap commented Jan 27, 2025

Changelist

[Describe or list the changes made in this PR]

fix some function names in comment

Test Plan

[Describe how this PR was tested (if applicable)]

Author/Reviewer Checklist

  • If this PR has changes that result in a different app state given the same prior state and transaction list, manually add the state-breaking label.
  • If the PR has breaking postgres changes to the indexer add the indexer-postgres-breaking label.
  • If this PR isn't state-breaking but has changes that modify behavior in PrepareProposal or ProcessProposal, manually add the label proposal-breaking.
  • If this PR is one of many that implement a specific feature, manually label them all feature:[feature-name].
  • If you wish to for mergify-bot to automatically create a PR to backport your change to a release branch, manually add the label backport/[branch-name].
  • Manually add any of the following labels: refactor, chore, bug.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated function and method comments for clarity in multiple files
    • Renamed functions to more accurately reflect their purpose:
      • GetAcknowledgeBridgeTxGetAcknowledgeBridgesTx
      • DecodeAddPremiumVotesTxDecodeUpdateMarketPricesTx
      • BenchmarkSimulationBenchmarkFullAppSimulation

@lencap lencap requested a review from a team as a code owner January 27, 2025 16:37
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 27, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request involves minor documentation and naming updates across three files in the protocol application. The changes primarily focus on renaming functions and their corresponding comments to better reflect their purpose, including pluralizing GetAcknowledgeBridgesTx, updating DecodeAddPremiumVotesTx to DecodeUpdateMarketPricesTx, and renaming the simulation benchmark function. These modifications aim to improve code clarity and consistency without altering the underlying functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
protocol/app/prepare/prepare_proposal.go Updated comment for GetAcknowledgeBridgesTx from singular to plural
protocol/app/process/market_prices.go Renamed function from DecodeAddPremiumVotesTx to DecodeUpdateMarketPricesTx
protocol/app/simulation_test.go Renamed benchmark function comment from BenchmarkSimulation to BenchmarkFullAppSimulation

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • teddyding

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, through the code we go,
Renaming functions with a scholarly glow
Bridges, markets, and simulations bright
Clarity shines, making logic just right!
A rabbit's refactor, precise and clean 🔍


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between afa37ec and a3eb3e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • protocol/app/prepare/prepare_proposal.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/app/process/market_prices.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/app/simulation_test.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • protocol/app/prepare/prepare_proposal.go
  • protocol/app/simulation_test.go
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (1)
protocol/app/process/market_prices.go (1)

Line range hint 21-26: LGTM! The function name and documentation accurately reflect its purpose.

The rename from DecodeAddPremiumVotesTx to DecodeUpdateMarketPricesTx improves clarity by better describing the function's role in processing market price updates.

Let's verify that the rename was applied consistently across the codebase:

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant