-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(affiliates): exclude liquidation fees in referred fee calculation #2585
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@Mergifyio backport release/indexer/v7.x |
✅ Backports have been created
|
… (backport #2585) (#2587) Co-authored-by: Teddy Ding <[email protected]>
Changelist
Exclude liquidation fee
Currently the affiliates referred fee include liquidation fee, which is an order of magnitude higher than regular maker/taker fees. Including this stats in "referred fees" stats is a bit misleading since this is "taker fee", but goes to insurance fund and is not rev sharable. Therefore we exclude liquidation fees in the stat (while keeping volume/trade count from liquidated fills).
Example from https://indexer.dydx.trade/v4/affiliates/snapshot:
GreenKiteIMX
is a VIP affiliate but its earnings is less than taker feesSort affiliates when offset is non zero
Sort affiliates by default when offset != 0 so there's strict ordering
Test Plan
[Describe how this PR was tested (if applicable)]
Author/Reviewer Checklist
state-breaking
label.indexer-postgres-breaking
label.PrepareProposal
orProcessProposal
, manually add the labelproposal-breaking
.feature:[feature-name]
.backport/[branch-name]
.refactor
,chore
,bug
.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
FillType
to improve data model complexity.Bug Fixes
Documentation