Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[OTE-692] Implement message server for affiliates #2216

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

affanv14
Copy link
Contributor

@affanv14 affanv14 commented Sep 5, 2024

Changelist

Implements msgserver for affililiates

Test Plan

[Describe how this PR was tested (if applicable)]

Author/Reviewer Checklist

  • If this PR has changes that result in a different app state given the same prior state and transaction list, manually add the state-breaking label.
  • If the PR has breaking postgres changes to the indexer add the indexer-postgres-breaking label.
  • If this PR isn't state-breaking but has changes that modify behavior in PrepareProposal or ProcessProposal, manually add the label proposal-breaking.
  • If this PR is one of many that implement a specific feature, manually label them all feature:[feature-name].
  • If you wish to for mergify-bot to automatically create a PR to backport your change to a release branch, manually add the label backport/[branch-name].
  • Manually add any of the following labels: refactor, chore, bug.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced functionality for registering affiliates and updating affiliate tiers, including error handling and response generation.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved control flow and logic for processing affiliate registrations and updates, addressing previous issues with nil responses.
  • Tests
    • Added comprehensive test cases for the affiliate registration and tier update functionalities to ensure robust validation.

@affanv14 affanv14 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 5, 2024 21:05
Copy link

linear bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes implement actual logic for the RegisterAffiliate and UpdateAffiliateTiers methods in the msgServer of the keeper package, replacing previous placeholder implementations. The updates include error handling and authority checks, enhancing the functionality of affiliate management. Additionally, new test functions were added to validate these methods, covering various scenarios to ensure robustness.

Changes

Files Change Summary
protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server.go Modified RegisterAffiliate and UpdateAffiliateTiers methods to include business logic and error handling.
protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server_test.go Added tests for RegisterAffiliate and UpdateAffiliateTiers to validate functionality under various scenarios.

Poem

🐰 In the meadow where the affiliates play,
New logic hops in, brightening the day!
With tiers and checks, all set to align,
Errors now caught, everything’s fine!
So let’s cheer for the code, oh what a delight,
A bouncy new world, where everything’s right! 🌼


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f1ef02c and 0003bf8.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server.go (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server.go (1)

28-34: Secure and efficient function for updating affiliate tiers.

The UpdateAffiliateTiers function properly checks for the caller's authority and handles errors effectively. It updates the affiliate tiers correctly and returns a response object upon success.

Suggestion for Improvement:
Consider enhancing the error message in line 30 to provide more context about why the authority is invalid, which could help in debugging and user feedback.

protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1)

31-94: Comprehensive test function for registering affiliates.

The TestMsgServer_RegisterAffiliate function is well-structured and covers a variety of scenarios, including valid registrations and various error conditions. The use of setup functions and assertions is appropriate and effective.

Suggestion for Improvement:
Consider adding more scenarios if there are other edge cases not covered by the current test cases.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3faadf9 and 9401504.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server.go (2 hunks)
  • protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server.go (1)

18-23: Well-implemented function for registering affiliates.

The RegisterAffiliate function correctly unwraps the SDK context, handles errors appropriately, and returns a response object upon successful registration.

protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1)

96-134: Effective test function for updating affiliate tiers.

The TestMsgServer_UpdateAffiliateTiers function correctly tests the authority checks and handles both valid and invalid update scenarios. The assertions are used effectively to ensure the expected outcomes.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1)

96-134: Well-structured test cases for UpdateAffiliateTiers with a suggestion for improvement.

The test function TestMsgServer_UpdateAffiliateTiers effectively distinguishes between valid and invalid updates, ensuring system integrity. The use of constants and structured error checking enhances readability and reliability.

Consider explicitly defining the expected error type in the test case for "non-gov module updates tiers" to improve clarity and ensure that the correct error is being tested.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9401504 and 2ab35ec.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1)

31-94: Well-structured and comprehensive test cases for RegisterAffiliate.

The test function TestMsgServer_RegisterAffiliate is well-organized using a table-driven approach, which is a best practice in Go testing. Each test case is clearly defined with expected errors and setup functions, ensuring comprehensive coverage and maintainability.

teddyding
teddyding previously approved these changes Sep 6, 2024
@teddyding teddyding self-requested a review September 6, 2024 14:38
@teddyding teddyding dismissed their stale review September 6, 2024 14:39

Comment requested

@affanv14 affanv14 force-pushed the affan/affiliates-msg-server branch from 2ab35ec to b1ffd0c Compare September 9, 2024 20:04
@affanv14 affanv14 force-pushed the affan/affiliates-msg-server branch from 2b33570 to f1ef02c Compare September 9, 2024 21:20
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server.go (2)

19-24: LGTM, but consider logging the error.

The code changes are approved.

However, consider logging the error before returning it to the caller for better observability.

Apply this diff to log the error:

 func (k msgServer) RegisterAffiliate(ctx context.Context,
 	msg *types.MsgRegisterAffiliate) (*types.MsgRegisterAffiliateResponse, error) {
 	sdkCtx := sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(ctx)
 	err := k.Keeper.RegisterAffiliate(sdkCtx, msg.Referee, msg.Affiliate)
 	if err != nil {
+		k.Logger(sdkCtx).Error("failed to register affiliate", "error", err)
 		return nil, err
 	}
 	return &types.MsgRegisterAffiliateResponse{}, nil
 }

Line range hint 29-49: LGTM, but consider logging the errors and adding a comment.

The code changes are approved.

However, consider the following improvements:

  1. Log the errors before returning them to the caller for better observability.
  2. Add a comment to explain the purpose of the revenue share safety validation.

Apply this diff to log the errors and add a comment:

 func (k msgServer) UpdateAffiliateTiers(ctx context.Context,
 	msg *types.MsgUpdateAffiliateTiers) (*types.MsgUpdateAffiliateTiersResponse, error) {
 	if !k.Keeper.HasAuthority(msg.Authority) {
+		err := errors.New("invalid authority")
+		k.Logger(sdkCtx).Error("failed to update affiliate tiers", "error", err)
 		return nil, errors.New("invalid authority")
 	}
 
 	sdkCtx := sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(ctx)
 	unconditionalRevShareConfig, err := k.revShareKeeper.GetUnconditionalRevShareConfigParams(sdkCtx)
 	if err != nil {
+		k.Logger(sdkCtx).Error("failed to get unconditional rev share config params", "error", err)
 		return nil, err
 	}
 	marketMapperRevShareParams := k.revShareKeeper.GetMarketMapperRevenueShareParams(sdkCtx)
 
+	// Validate the revenue share safety to ensure that the affiliate tiers do not exceed the maximum allowed revenue share.
 	if !k.revShareKeeper.ValidateRevShareSafety(msg.Tiers, unconditionalRevShareConfig, marketMapperRevShareParams) {
+		err := errorsmod.Wrapf(
+			types.ErrRevShareSafetyViolation,
+			"rev share safety violation",
+		)
+		k.Logger(sdkCtx).Error("failed to update affiliate tiers", "error", err)
 		return nil, errorsmod.Wrapf(
 			types.ErrRevShareSafetyViolation,
 			"rev share safety violation",
 		)
 	}
 
 	k.Keeper.UpdateAffiliateTiers(sdkCtx, msg.Tiers)
 
 	return &types.MsgUpdateAffiliateTiersResponse{}, nil
 }
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2ab35ec and f1ef02c.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server.go (3 hunks)
  • protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • protocol/x/affiliates/keeper/msg_server_test.go

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants