Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

return mintedShares in vault deposit keeper method #2139

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2024
Merged

return mintedShares in vault deposit keeper method #2139

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2024

Conversation

tqin7
Copy link
Contributor

@tqin7 tqin7 commented Aug 22, 2024

Changelist

  1. refactor deposit logic into a single keeper method
  2. return mintedShares

Test Plan

  • modified test cases for MintShares
  • existing test cases for msg server method DepositToMegavault

Author/Reviewer Checklist

  • If this PR has changes that result in a different app state given the same prior state and transaction list, manually add the state-breaking label.
  • If the PR has breaking postgres changes to the indexer add the indexer-postgres-breaking label.
  • If this PR isn't state-breaking but has changes that modify behavior in PrepareProposal or ProcessProposal, manually add the label proposal-breaking.
  • If this PR is one of many that implement a specific feature, manually label them all feature:[feature-name].
  • If you wish to for mergify-bot to automatically create a PR to backport your change to a release branch, manually add the label backport/[branch-name].
  • Manually add any of the following labels: refactor, chore, bug.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new property mintedShares in deposit response, providing additional details on shares minted from deposits.
    • Added a DepositToMegavault method, streamlining the deposit process and enhancing user interaction with megavault transactions.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in the share minting process to provide more informative responses.
  • Tests

    • Updated test cases for MintShares to validate minted shares alongside error checking.

@tqin7 tqin7 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 22, 2024 16:17
Copy link

linear bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve enhancements to the deposit functionality within the megavault system, focusing on the addition of minted shares in responses. Key updates include modifications to interfaces, methods, and protocol files to support this new property. The deposit process is streamlined by consolidating operations, improving error handling, and ensuring that relevant information about shares is consistently provided across different components.

Changes

Files Change Summary
indexer/packages/v4-protos/src/codegen/dydxprotocol/vault/tx.ts, proto/dydxprotocol/vault/tx.proto Added mintedShares property to MsgDepositToMegavaultResponse and corresponding SDK type, updated encoding/decoding methods, and modified the proto message to support share minting functionality.
protocol/x/vault/keeper/deposit.go, protocol/x/vault/keeper/deposit_test.go, protocol/x/vault/keeper/msg_server_deposit_to_megavault.go Introduced DepositToMegavault method and modified MintShares to return minted shares and errors. Adjusted test cases to validate share outcomes and streamlined deposit logic for efficiency and clarity.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant MsgServer
    participant Keeper
    participant Vault

    User->>MsgServer: DepositToMegavault(msg)
    MsgServer->>Keeper: DepositToMegavault(ctx, fromSubaccount, quoteQuantums)
    Keeper->>Vault: MintShares(ctx, owner, quantumsToDeposit)
    Vault-->>Keeper: Return mintedShares
    Keeper-->>MsgServer: Return mintedShares, error
    MsgServer-->>User: MsgDepositToMegavaultResponse(mintedShares)
Loading

Poem

🐰 In the vault where shares do bloom,
A hop of joy dispels all gloom.
With minted shares, our treasures grow,
A dance of deposits, in swift flow.
Let's leap and cheer, for changes bright,
In this rabbit's world, all feels just right! ✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 70a7ebd and 55b033b.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • protocol/x/vault/types/tx.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (5)
  • indexer/packages/v4-protos/src/codegen/dydxprotocol/vault/tx.ts (5 hunks)
  • proto/dydxprotocol/vault/tx.proto (2 hunks)
  • protocol/x/vault/keeper/deposit.go (5 hunks)
  • protocol/x/vault/keeper/deposit_test.go (2 hunks)
  • protocol/x/vault/keeper/msg_server_deposit_to_megavault.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (11)
protocol/x/vault/keeper/msg_server_deposit_to_megavault.go (1)

18-29: LGTM! Verify the usage of the updated function.

The refactor simplifies the deposit process and improves maintainability by consolidating operations into a single call and returning minted shares directly.

Ensure that the updated function is correctly integrated and used throughout the codebase.

Run the following script to verify the function usage:

Verification successful

Function Integration Verified Successfully

The DepositToMegavault function is correctly integrated and used within the codebase, specifically in msg_server_deposit_to_megavault.go. The function call aligns with the new logic, confirming proper usage.

  • protocol/x/vault/keeper/msg_server_deposit_to_megavault.go: Correct usage of DepositToMegavault.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `DepositToMegavault` match the new logic.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new logic.
rg --type go -A 5 $'DepositToMegavault'

Length of output: 31609


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for direct invocations of the `DepositToMegavault` function in the keeper.

# Test: Search for the function usage in the keeper.
rg --type go -A 5 'DepositToMegavault('

Length of output: 130


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for direct invocations of the `DepositToMegavault` function in the keeper.

# Test: Search for the function usage in the keeper with corrected regex.
rg --type go -A 5 'DepositToMegavault\('

Length of output: 6274

proto/dydxprotocol/vault/tx.proto (1)

48-51: LGTM!

The addition of the minted_shares field enhances the response by providing detailed feedback on share issuance.

protocol/x/vault/keeper/deposit.go (2)

13-48: LGTM!

The DepositToMegavault function is well-structured, consolidating the deposit process and ensuring accurate share calculations.


Line range hint 49-133: LGTM!

The MintShares function now returns minted shares and improves error handling, enhancing its utility.

protocol/x/vault/keeper/deposit_test.go (1)

Line range hint 187-213: LGTM! Validate the test coverage.

The changes improve the robustness of the test by capturing and validating mintedShares. Ensure that all edge cases are covered.

Consider running the test suite to verify the coverage and correctness of the tests.

Run the following script to verify the test coverage:

indexer/packages/v4-protos/src/codegen/dydxprotocol/vault/tx.ts (6)

33-36: LGTM! The mintedShares property is a valuable addition.

The inclusion of the mintedShares property enhances the response by providing additional information about the transaction.


39-42: LGTM! The minted_shares property ensures consistency.

The inclusion of the minted_shares property in the SDK type maintains consistency with the standard type.


162-164: LGTM! Initialization aligns with the optional property.

The mintedShares property is correctly initialized to undefined, reflecting its optional nature.


168-171: LGTM! Encoding logic is correctly updated.

The encode function now properly handles the mintedShares field, ensuring it is encoded when defined.


185-187: LGTM! Decoding logic is correctly updated.

The decode function now properly reconstructs the mintedShares field from the input data.


198-200: LGTM! fromPartial function is correctly updated.

The fromPartial function now properly accommodates the mintedShares property, ensuring accurate transformation of partial objects.

@tqin7 tqin7 merged commit 14393e4 into main Aug 22, 2024
38 checks passed
@tqin7 tqin7 deleted the tq/tra-563 branch August 22, 2024 18:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants