Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update main-net node setup. #2046

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

vincentwschau
Copy link
Contributor

@vincentwschau vincentwschau commented Aug 6, 2024

Changelist

Fix typo for the generation of full-node indices for the startup / setup scripts. Indices should start from 0 not 1.

Test Plan

[Describe how this PR was tested (if applicable)]

Author/Reviewer Checklist

  • If this PR has changes that result in a different app state given the same prior state and transaction list, manually add the state-breaking label.
  • If the PR has breaking postgres changes to the indexer add the indexer-postgres-breaking label.
  • If this PR isn't state-breaking but has changes that modify behavior in PrepareProposal or ProcessProposal, manually add the label proposal-breaking.
  • If this PR is one of many that implement a specific feature, manually label them all feature:[feature-name].
  • If you wish to for mergify-bot to automatically create a PR to backport your change to a release branch, manually add the label backport/[branch-name].
  • Manually add any of the following labels: refactor, chore, bug.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated node initialization scripts to include full node at index 0, enhancing the setup process.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected indexing issues in node directory creation, ensuring all nodes are properly configured from index 0.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes made to the mainnet.sh and start.sh scripts involve modifying the loop indices for creating full node directories and initializing CosmosVisor. By transitioning from a one-based to a zero-based indexing approach, these adjustments ensure a more inclusive setup for node configurations, allowing the inclusion of the node at index 0. This could impact overall node behavior and initialization processes, aligning them with standard programming practices.

Changes

Files Change Summary
protocol/testing/mainnet/mainnet.sh Modified create_full_nodes function to start the loop from index 0, affecting directory creation and config files.
protocol/testing/mainnet/start.sh Updated loop index for CosmosVisor setup from 1 to 0, now including the full node at index 0.

Poem

🐇 In the land of nodes both full and bright,
A little change brought new delight.
From one to zero, we hop and play,
Configs now dance in a joyous array.
With every script and every run,
A happier network has begun! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
protocol/testing/mainnet/mainnet.sh (1)

49-49: Inconsistency Detected: Align the usage of LAST_FULL_NODE_INDEX across all scripts

The change to include the full node at index 0 in the directory creation process in mainnet.sh aligns with the usage in start.sh. However, there is an inconsistency with snapshot.sh where the loop starts from 1.

  • protocol/testing/mainnet/snapshot.sh (line 1): for i in $(seq 1 $LAST_FULL_NODE_INDEX); do
  • protocol/testing/mainnet/start.sh (line 1): for i in $(seq 0 $LAST_FULL_NODE_INDEX); do
  • protocol/testing/mainnet/mainnet.sh (lines 49, 54, 59): for i in $(seq 0 $LAST_FULL_NODE_INDEX); do

Ensure that the loop index is consistent across all scripts to avoid any unintended side effects.

Analysis chain

LGTM! But verify the impact on node creation logic.

The change to include the full node at index 0 in the directory creation process is approved.

However, ensure that this change aligns with the overall node creation logic and does not introduce any unintended side effects.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of including the full node at index 0 in the directory creation process.

# Test: Search for the usage of the variable `LAST_FULL_NODE_INDEX` in the codebase to ensure consistency.
rg --type shell -A 5 $'LAST_FULL_NODE_INDEX'

Length of output: 73


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of including the full node at index 0 in the directory creation process.

# Test: Search for the usage of the variable `LAST_FULL_NODE_INDEX` in the codebase to ensure consistency.
rg -A 5 'LAST_FULL_NODE_INDEX'

Length of output: 2610

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6e93e00 and 77712ca.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • protocol/testing/mainnet/mainnet.sh (1 hunks)
  • protocol/testing/mainnet/start.sh (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
protocol/testing/mainnet/start.sh (1)

12-12: LGTM! But verify the impact on node setup logic.

The change to include the full node at index 0 in the setup process is approved.

However, ensure that this change aligns with the overall node setup logic and does not introduce any unintended side effects.

protocol/testing/mainnet/mainnet.sh (2)

64-64: LGTM! But verify the impact on node setup logic.

The change to include the full node at index 0 in the CosmosVisor setup process is approved.

However, ensure that this change aligns with the overall node setup logic and does not introduce any unintended side effects.


56-56: LGTM! But verify the impact on node initialization logic.

The change to include the full node at index 0 in the genesis file copying process is approved.

However, ensure that this change aligns with the overall node initialization logic and does not introduce any unintended side effects.

@vincentwschau vincentwschau merged commit 2afb412 into main Aug 6, 2024
18 checks passed
@vincentwschau vincentwschau deleted the vincentc/update-mainnet-node-setup branch August 6, 2024 20:55
@vincentwschau
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mergifyio backport release/protocol/v5.2.x

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Aug 6, 2024

backport release/protocol/v5.2.x

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2024
(cherry picked from commit 2afb412)
vincentwschau added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2024
@jonfung-dydx
Copy link
Contributor

@Mergifyio backport release/protocol/v6.x

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 3, 2024

backport release/protocol/v6.x

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
(cherry picked from commit 2afb412)
jonfung-dydx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants