[Full node streaming] emit taker order status at end of matching loop #2022
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited to specific labels. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the system's ability to manage and report on taker orders through the introduction of a new method, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant FullNodeStreamingManager
participant MemClobKeeper
participant Keeper
User->>Keeper: SendTakerOrderStatus(takerOrder)
Keeper->>FullNodeStreamingManager: SendTakerOrderStatus(takerOrder)
FullNodeStreamingManager->>MemClobKeeper: SendTakerOrderStatus(takerOrder)
MemClobKeeper-->>FullNodeStreamingManager: Acknowledge order status update
FullNodeStreamingManager-->>Keeper: Confirm order status sent
Keeper-->>User: Acknowledge order status processing
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (12)
- protocol/mocks/MemClobKeeper.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/streaming/full_node_streaming_manager.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/streaming/noop_streaming_manager.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/streaming/types/interface.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/testutil/memclob/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/keeper/keeper.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/memclob/memclob.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/memclob/memclob_grpc_streaming.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/types/liquidation_order.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/types/mem_clob_keeper.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/types/order.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/types/orderbook.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (14)
protocol/streaming/types/interface.go (1)
37-41: LGTM! Verify the method usage in the codebase.The addition of the
SendTakerOrderStatusmethod to theFullNodeStreamingManagerinterface looks good. Ensure that all implementations of this interface have this method defined.Verification successful
Verification of
SendTakerOrderStatusMethod ImplementationThe
SendTakerOrderStatusmethod has been correctly added to theFullNodeStreamingManagerinterface and implemented in the following files:
protocol/streaming/full_node_streaming_manager.goprotocol/streaming/noop_streaming_manager.goprotocol/testutil/memclob/keeper.goprotocol/x/clob/keeper/keeper.goprotocol/mocks/MemClobKeeper.goAll implementations of the
FullNodeStreamingManagerinterface have theSendTakerOrderStatusmethod defined.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all implementations of the `FullNodeStreamingManager` interface have the `SendTakerOrderStatus` method defined. # Test: Search for the method implementation. Expect: All implementations should include the new method. rg --type go -A 5 'SendTakerOrderStatus'Length of output: 3810
protocol/streaming/noop_streaming_manager.go (1)
45-50: LGTM! Verify the method usage in the codebase.The addition of the
SendTakerOrderStatusmethod to theNoopGrpcStreamingManagerclass looks good. Ensure that the empty body is intentional and does not affect the functionality.Verification successful
LGTM! The empty body of the
SendTakerOrderStatusmethod in theNoopGrpcStreamingManageris intentional and consistent with the no-op design of the manager.
NoopGrpcStreamingManageris designed as a no-operation implementation with all methods having empty bodies.- The
Enabledmethod returnsfalse, further indicating that this manager is not intended to perform any operations.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `SendTakerOrderStatus` method in the codebase to ensure the empty body does not affect functionality. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Ensure that the empty body is intentional. rg --type go -A 5 'SendTakerOrderStatus'Length of output: 3810
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the definition and context of NoopGrpcStreamingManager to confirm the intent of the empty SendTakerOrderStatus method. # Search for the definition of NoopGrpcStreamingManager class or struct. rg --type go -A 10 'type NoopGrpcStreamingManager struct' # Search for the usage of NoopGrpcStreamingManager in the codebase. rg --type go -A 5 'NoopGrpcStreamingManager'Length of output: 4521
protocol/x/clob/types/mem_clob_keeper.go (1)
107-110: LGTM! Verify the method usage in the codebase.The addition of the
SendTakerOrderStatusmethod to theMemClobKeeperinterface looks good. Ensure that all implementations of this interface have this method defined.protocol/x/clob/types/liquidation_order.go (1)
118-122: LGTM!The
MustGetLiquidationOrdermethod is correctly implemented to fulfill theMatchableOrderinterface.protocol/x/clob/types/order.go (1)
135-139: LGTM!The
MustGetLiquidationOrdermethod is correctly implemented to fulfill theMatchableOrderinterface by panicking as expected.protocol/x/clob/types/orderbook.go (1)
209-211: LGTM! But verify the usage of the new method.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all implementations of the
MatchableOrderinterface correctly handle the newMustGetLiquidationOrdermethod.Verification successful
Let's correct the regex pattern and rerun the search to verify the implementations of the
MatchableOrderinterface.
Let's search for the
MustGetLiquidationOrdermethod and its implementations to ensure it is correctly handled.
The
MustGetLiquidationOrdermethod is correctly implemented and used.The method has been added to the
MatchableOrderinterface and implemented for bothLiquidationOrderandOrder. TheOrderimplementation correctly panics, ensuring the expected behavior. The method is also being utilized in the codebase.
protocol/x/clob/types/orderbook.goprotocol/x/clob/types/liquidation_order.goprotocol/x/clob/types/order.goprotocol/x/clob/memclob/memclob_grpc_streaming.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all implementations of the `MatchableOrder` interface handle the new method. # Test: Search for the implementations of the `MatchableOrder` interface. Expect: Implementations correctly handle the new method. rg --type go -A 10 $'type MatchableOrder interface {'Length of output: 180
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all implementations of the `MatchableOrder` interface handle the new method. # Test: Search for the implementations of the `MatchableOrder` interface. Expect: Implementations correctly handle the new method. rg --type go -A 10 'type MatchableOrder interface \{'Length of output: 1096
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the `MustGetLiquidationOrder` method and its implementations in the codebase. # Test: Search for the `MustGetLiquidationOrder` method in the codebase. Expect: Implementations correctly handle the new method. rg --type go 'MustGetLiquidationOrder'Length of output: 899
protocol/x/clob/keeper/keeper.go (3)
Line range hint
270-274:
Comment update approved.The comment update clarifies the intended recipient of the updates.
Line range hint
286-292:
Comment update approved.The comment update clarifies the intended recipient of the updates.
302-312: New methodSendTakerOrderStatusapproved.The method is correctly implemented and follows the pattern of the existing methods.
protocol/streaming/full_node_streaming_manager.go (1)
365-391: New methodSendTakerOrderStatusapproved.The method is correctly implemented and follows the pattern of the existing methods. The logic for determining the
clobPairIdis clear and ensures the correctclobPairIdis used based on the type of order.protocol/mocks/MemClobKeeper.go (1)
419-422: LGTM!The new mock function
SendTakerOrderStatusis consistent with the pattern established by other mock functions in the class and enhances the mock functionality.protocol/x/clob/memclob/memclob.go (3)
772-775: Correct use ofGenerateStreamTakerOrder.The
GenerateStreamTakerOrderfunction is correctly used to generate the stream taker order.
776-779: Correct use ofSendTakerOrderStatus.The
SendTakerOrderStatusmethod ofclobKeeperis correctly used to send the taker order status.
770-780: EnsuregenerateOrderbookUpdatesis properly initialized.The new conditional block correctly checks if
generateOrderbookUpdatesis enabled before emitting the taker order status. Ensure thatgenerateOrderbookUpdatesis properly initialized and managed to avoid unexpected behavior.Verification successful
Ensure
generateOrderbookUpdatesis properly initialized.The
generateOrderbookUpdatesfield is correctly initialized tofalsein the constructor and managed via theSetGenerateOrderbookUpdatesmethod. This ensures that the conditional check forgenerateOrderbookUpdatesin thematchOrdermethod will function correctly based on its current state.
MemClobPriceTimePrioritystruct definesgenerateOrderbookUpdates.- Initialized to
falsein the constructor.- Managed via
SetGenerateOrderbookUpdatesmethod.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization and management of `generateOrderbookUpdates`. # Test: Search for the initialization and management of `generateOrderbookUpdates`. Expect: Proper initialization and management. rg --type go --context 5 'generateOrderbookUpdates'Length of output: 5632
| // GenerateStreamTakerOrder returns a `StreamTakerOrder` object used in full node | ||
| // streaming from a matchableOrder and a taker order status. | ||
| func (m *MemClobPriceTimePriority) GenerateStreamTakerOrder( | ||
| takerOrder types.MatchableOrder, | ||
| takerOrderStatus types.TakerOrderStatus, | ||
| ) types.StreamTakerOrder { | ||
| if takerOrder.IsLiquidation() { | ||
| liquidationOrder := takerOrder.MustGetLiquidationOrder() | ||
| streamLiquidationOrder := liquidationOrder.ToStreamLiquidationOrder() | ||
| return types.StreamTakerOrder{ | ||
| TakerOrder: &types.StreamTakerOrder_LiquidationOrder{ | ||
| LiquidationOrder: streamLiquidationOrder, | ||
| }, | ||
| TakerOrderStatus: takerOrderStatus.ToStreamingTakerOrderStatus(), | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| order := takerOrder.MustGetOrder() | ||
| return types.StreamTakerOrder{ | ||
| TakerOrder: &types.StreamTakerOrder_Order{ | ||
| Order: &order, | ||
| }, | ||
| TakerOrderStatus: takerOrderStatus.ToStreamingTakerOrderStatus(), | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor suggestion: Simplify the nested if-else.
The nested if-else can be simplified for better readability.
func (m *MemClobPriceTimePriority) GenerateStreamTakerOrder(
takerOrder types.MatchableOrder,
takerOrderStatus types.TakerOrderStatus,
) types.StreamTakerOrder {
if takerOrder.IsLiquidation() {
liquidationOrder := takerOrder.MustGetLiquidationOrder()
streamLiquidationOrder := liquidationOrder.ToStreamLiquidationOrder()
return types.StreamTakerOrder{
TakerOrder: &types.StreamTakerOrder_LiquidationOrder{
LiquidationOrder: streamLiquidationOrder,
},
TakerOrderStatus: takerOrderStatus.ToStreamingTakerOrderStatus(),
}
}
order := takerOrder.MustGetOrder()
return types.StreamTakerOrder{
TakerOrder: &types.StreamTakerOrder_Order{
Order: &order,
},
TakerOrderStatus: takerOrderStatus.ToStreamingTakerOrderStatus(),
}
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| func (f *FakeMemClobKeeper) SendTakerOrderStatus( | ||
| ctx sdk.Context, | ||
| takerOrder types.StreamTakerOrder, | ||
| ) { | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Provide a mock implementation or a TODO comment.
The new method SendTakerOrderStatus is added to the FakeMemClobKeeper struct but its implementation is empty. Consider providing a mock implementation or adding a TODO comment to indicate future work.
+ // TODO: Implement the mock logic for SendTakerOrderStatusCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func (f *FakeMemClobKeeper) SendTakerOrderStatus( | |
| ctx sdk.Context, | |
| takerOrder types.StreamTakerOrder, | |
| ) { | |
| } | |
| func (f *FakeMemClobKeeper) SendTakerOrderStatus( | |
| ctx sdk.Context, | |
| takerOrder types.StreamTakerOrder, | |
| ) { | |
| // TODO: Implement the mock logic for SendTakerOrderStatus | |
| } |
| UpdateMessage: &clobtypes.StreamUpdate_TakerOrder{ | ||
| TakerOrder: &streamTakerOrder, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
for my understanding - do we need to send any fill amounts for taker orders?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It should have the fill amounts in a following full node stream update if you are subscribed to the correct clob pair id!
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
SendTakerOrderStatusfunction for better order status handling across multiple components.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor