Fix RTD docs build #72
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
LGTM, feel free to merge on green. |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For a few months, docs on RTD have been failing because the conda-based install is too memory-intensive. This switches back to a setuptools/pip-based install. I think I'd switched to conda when there was some problem installing MDTraj over pip; now I switch back.
I don't think there were any changes to docs between last successful build of
master(latestin docs) and now, except the date bump in this PR. However, the docs forstablestill reflect 0.4.0, not 0.5.0 (name and credits are the giveaways).This PR fixes it; you can verify that in the RTD build of the docs branch (with updated copyright year): https://contact-map.readthedocs.io/en/docs/