Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade dependencies #381

Closed
wants to merge 21 commits into from
Closed

Upgrade dependencies #381

wants to merge 21 commits into from

Conversation

Maxxen
Copy link
Member

@Maxxen Maxxen commented Aug 28, 2024

GEOS 3.12 -> 3.13beta
GDAL 3.8 -> 3.9
PROJ 9.1.1 -> 9.4.1

@Maxxen
Copy link
Member Author

Maxxen commented Aug 28, 2024

Note to self:

  • Don't build shell on windows as the sqlite symbols conflict
  • GDAL requires cpp17 headers that's not available on our CI

@rcoup
Copy link
Contributor

rcoup commented Nov 11, 2024

GDAL 3.10, GEOS 3.13, and Proj 9.5 are all out now... anything I can help with here?

FYI, there's also a change proposed for both GDAL and PROJ to formalise embedding resources (like proj.db) into the libraries based on your existing approach.

@Maxxen
Copy link
Member Author

Maxxen commented Nov 11, 2024

@rcoup Not really, we bumped to latest GEOS separately before DuckDB v1.1.1(I think..). We can't really move forward with latest GDAL because the c++17 requirement is not compatible with our CI setup, and ideally we want spatial to be available on older targets.

@rcoup
Copy link
Contributor

rcoup commented Nov 12, 2024

By "our CI environment" do you mean https://github.com/duckdb/extension-ci-tools ?

The manylinux2014 toolchain has a newer GCC (v10) from Redhat such that it supports C++17, and there's newer GCC (v9/10/11/13) available from the Ubuntu team for 18.04. So should be possible...

@Maxxen Maxxen closed this Dec 4, 2024
@Maxxen
Copy link
Member Author

Maxxen commented Dec 4, 2024

The manylinux2014 toolchain has a newer GCC (v10) from Redhat such that it supports C++17, and there's newer GCC (v9/10/11/13) available from the Ubuntu team for 18.04. So should be possible...

CC @carlopi

@carlopi
Copy link
Contributor

carlopi commented Dec 4, 2024

Discussed with @Maxxen and @samansmink, I think this is something that would be interesting to look at this in general in the next release cycle.

Extensions (eg. spatial) are free to get ahead and experiment with this, but this comes with some cost, and maybe it's better to do this properly on the tooling side.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants