Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

👷 Remove useless CI stage (HEAD) #720

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2020
Merged

👷 Remove useless CI stage (HEAD) #720

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2020

Conversation

dubzzz
Copy link
Owner

@dubzzz dubzzz commented Jul 7, 2020

Why is this PR for?

HEAD was initially responsible to check for future regressions introduced by libraries.
Now that dependabot bumps libraries for us, this is needed anymore.

The only thing we will lose if that it was also checking that fast-check will still work with latest revisions of node. Actually it should not be a real issue...

In a nutshell

❌ New feature
❌ Fix an issue
❌ Documentation improvement
✔️ Other: ci

(✔️: yes, ❌: no)

Potential impacts

None

HEAD was initially responsible to check for future regressions introduced by libraries.
Now that dependabot bumps libraries for us, this is needed anymore.

The only thing we will lose if that it was also checking that fast-check will still work with latest revisions of node. Actually it should not be a real issue...
@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Jul 7, 2020

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit b2cd465:

Sandbox Source
Vanilla Configuration
dubzzz/fast-check: example Configuration

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 95.812% when pulling b2cd465 on remove-head-travis into 71f6c12 on master.

@dubzzz dubzzz merged commit c94708b into master Jul 8, 2020
@dubzzz dubzzz deleted the remove-head-travis branch July 8, 2020 06:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants