Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resouces do not work on Windows Server Core #8

Closed
J0F3 opened this issue Jan 17, 2018 · 0 comments · Fixed by #9
Closed

Resouces do not work on Windows Server Core #8

J0F3 opened this issue Jan 17, 2018 · 0 comments · Fixed by #9
Labels
enhancement The issue is an enhancement request.

Comments

@J0F3
Copy link
Contributor

J0F3 commented Jan 17, 2018

The function CheckForPreReqs in xBitlockerCommon.psm1 check for the installation of the Windows Feature "RSAT-Feature-Tools-BitLocker-RemoteAdminTool" which does not exist on Server Core.

Actually this affects also the xBLAutoBitlocker and the xBLTPM resouce as there make also use of the CheckForPreReqs function.

However, at least, the xBLBitlocker resource works actually also without this feature installed on server core.
So the main question would be if this features is really required?

@J0F3 J0F3 changed the title Resouces do not work on Windows Server 2016 Resouces do not work on Windows Server 2016 Core Jan 17, 2018
@J0F3 J0F3 changed the title Resouces do not work on Windows Server 2016 Core Resouces do not work on Windows Server Core Jan 17, 2018
@J0F3 J0F3 mentioned this issue Jan 17, 2018
@johlju johlju added enhancement The issue is an enhancement request. in progress The issue is being actively worked on by someone. labels May 16, 2018
@johlju johlju closed this as completed in #9 Jun 12, 2018
johlju pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 12, 2018
- Fixed an issue in CheckForPreReqs function where on Server Core the installation of the
  non existing Windows Feature 'RSAT-Feature-Tools-BitLocker-RemoteAdminTool' was
  erroneously checked (issue #8).
@johlju johlju removed the in progress The issue is being actively worked on by someone. label Jun 12, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement The issue is an enhancement request.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants