[release/6.0.4xx] Update dependencies from dotnet/linker

[dotnet-maestro]

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/linker

• Subscription: f9820654-7ba0-45dd-803d-08dc74de8f36
• Build: 20240520.5
• Date Produced: May 20, 2024 11:05:27 PM UTC
• Commit: e66cbcaa36aa719936a46160198c9012c6e174e4
• Branch: refs/heads/release/6.0.x

• Updates:
  • Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers: from 6.0.200-1.22553.1 to 6.0.200-1.24270.5
  • Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks: from 6.0.200-1.22553.1 to 6.0.200-1.24270.5

[baronfel]

This fixes #29927

[marcpopMSFT]

@dotnet/source-build-internal It's looking for a linker SB package and can't find it. I couldn't find it either when searching through darc:
Unable to find package Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.linker with version (= 6.0.200-1.24219.1)

[ellahathaway]

@dotnet/source-build-internal It's looking for a linker SB package and can't find it. I couldn't find it either when searching through darc: Unable to find package Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.linker with version (= 6.0.200-1.24219.1)

Hm I also can't find it in any of the feeds. I went through the internal linker pipeline, and the 6.0 runs don't have a source-build leg... not sure why that is, but it would explain why the package doesn't exist. The public runs do source-build, however.

@dotnet/source-build-internal - Do we know why linker's 6.0 runs don't include a source-build leg? Link to pipeline run (internal Microsoft link). I'm wondering if the lack of the build leg is intentional or not.

[MichaelSimons]

@dotnet/source-build-internal - Do we know why linker's 6.0 runs don't include a source-build leg? Link to pipeline run (internal Microsoft link). I'm wondering if the lack of the build leg is intentional or not.

This looks to be the result of dotnet/linker#3245 which introduced a new official build pipeline without a source-build leg. cc @agocke.

[MichaelSimons]

Given we don't support source-build in 6.0.4xx we could switch the version.details.xml dependency to use the SourceBuildTarball attribute instead of SourceBuild. This will avoid trying to load the intermediate for the dependency but still include the dependency in the source tarball.

[agocke]

@dotnet/source-build-internal - Do we know why linker's 6.0 runs don't include a source-build leg? Link to pipeline run (internal Microsoft link). I'm wondering if the lack of the build leg is intentional or not.

This looks to be the result of dotnet/linker#3245 which introduced a new official build pipeline without a source-build leg. cc @agocke.

Looks like I dropped it during 1ES conversion. I can just copy over the previous definition, if that's sufficient.