Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix ldarg_i test #79834

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2022
Merged

Fix ldarg_i test #79834

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2022

Conversation

janvorli
Copy link
Member

When changing the test recently, I have missed the conv.i4 that I should have removed from the preexisting code. The test was passing when runincontext was passed to the coreclr test run, so I have incorrectly assumed that it will work in regular runs too.

@janvorli janvorli added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Dec 19, 2022
@janvorli janvorli self-assigned this Dec 19, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 19, 2022

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch, @kunalspathak
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

When changing the test recently, I have missed the conv.i4 that I should have removed from the preexisting code. The test was passing when runincontext was passed to the coreclr test run, so I have incorrectly assumed that it will work in regular runs too.

Author: janvorli
Assignees: janvorli
Labels:

area-CodeGen-coreclr

Milestone: -

@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
ldsflda int32 _ldarg::FOO
ldc.i4 0x2
add
conv.i4
ldsflda int32 _ldarg::FOO
call int32 _ldarg::args(int32)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm confused: the main branch contains:

call	native int _ldarg::args(native int)

but GitHub is showing me the baseline of:

call	int32 _ldarg::args(int32)

?

@BruceForstall
Copy link
Member

Note that you need to trigger outerloop tests if you want this test to actually run.

@BruceForstall BruceForstall mentioned this pull request Dec 19, 2022
When changing the test recently, I have missed the conv.i4 that I should
have removed from the preexisting code. The test was passing when
`runincontext` was passed to the coreclr test run, so I have incorrectly
assumed that it will work in regular runs too.
@janvorli
Copy link
Member Author

@BruceForstall I've accidentally made the change against an old main. I've just force pushed a fixed one.

@janvorli
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@BruceForstall
Copy link
Member

The pri-0 test build failed due to some nuget problem, but the outerloop test run succeeded, so I'm going to merge this.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants