Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove closed issues from issues.targets #75363

Merged
merged 26 commits into from
Oct 6, 2022

Conversation

eduardo-vp
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 9, 2022

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

null

Author: eduardo-vp
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone: -

@trylek
Copy link
Member

trylek commented Sep 9, 2022

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Copy link
Member

@trylek trylek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, thanks for cleaning this up!

@eduardo-vp eduardo-vp marked this pull request as ready for review September 9, 2022 19:12
@trylek
Copy link
Member

trylek commented Sep 9, 2022

@eduardo-vp The failed mono tests hit an interesting corner case - you correctly removed the exclusions marked with the issue #41519 but apparently the issue was just closed due to being a duplicate of another issue, #64127, that is still pending. I think that in this particular case we probably need to put the exclusions back and just rename the tracking issue link. Hopefully there are no more cases like this.

@AntonLapounov
Copy link
Member

Duplicate issues should be resolved as "not planned" instead of "completed" and we should recognize the former as "not fixed".

@trylek
Copy link
Member

trylek commented Sep 9, 2022

@AntonLapounov - thanks for the comment, I've also been thinking that we should somehow clarify the workflow here. The interesting question is, how would it work in this particular case? OK, let's assume that @radical closed the issue #41519 as "not planned" and so Eduardo didn't try to remove the exclusions from the issues.targets file. Now what should happen once #64127 is fixed? The exclusions would stay in issues.targets forever unless someone took additional action to somehow subsequently change the status of #41519 to "completed" as a consequence of completing #64127. In general I think that we'd need better tracking of the issue graph on GitHub to be able to fully automate this.

@trylek
Copy link
Member

trylek commented Sep 9, 2022

/cc @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure as this PR uncovers a larger question of properly tracking GitHub issue dependencies.

@jkotas
Copy link
Member

jkotas commented Sep 13, 2022

clarify the workflow here

I think we want to maintain invariant that the issue the test is disabled against is active. Thus the closure of an issue with disabled-test tag should be accompanied by a PR that edits the test metadata in sources. If the issue is being closed as a duplicate, the PR should just update the issue that the test is disabled against.

@trylek
Copy link
Member

trylek commented Sep 19, 2022

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@trylek
Copy link
Member

trylek commented Sep 19, 2022

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@eduardo-vp
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@eduardo-vp
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@eduardo-vp
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@eduardo-vp
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@eduardo-vp
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@eduardo-vp
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@eduardo-vp
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@eduardo-vp
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@eduardo-vp eduardo-vp merged commit 105841c into dotnet:main Oct 6, 2022
BruceForstall added a commit to BruceForstall/runtime that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2022
BruceForstall added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2022
@BruceForstall
Copy link
Member

Note: another failure from this change was #76845, which only appears during JitStress runs (on Linux/arm32).

eduardo-vp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2022
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 10, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants