-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix some flag uses #34969
Merged
Merged
Fix some flag uses #34969
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -9443,7 +9443,7 @@ void LinearScan::lsraGetOperandString(GenTree* tree, | |
unsigned operandStringLength) | ||
{ | ||
const char* lastUseChar = ""; | ||
if ((tree->gtFlags & GTF_VAR_DEATH) != 0) | ||
if (tree->OperIsScalarLocal() && ((tree->gtFlags & GTF_VAR_DEATH) != 0)) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is just a fix to the dump - we shouldn't be checking last use on anything but lclVars. |
||
{ | ||
lastUseChar = "*"; | ||
} | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are cases where we have a SIMD that we don't normalize when the lclVar is created because the basetype is "Canon". These were getting by before because of the bug in the importer where we were setting
GTF_IND_TGT_ANYWHERE
on the lclVar, which for a lclVar isGTF_VAR_CAST
, so it passed the above check.Note that prior to the introduction of SIMD types, struct types would always "match" here.
(Also, I think the
allowStructs
is just wrong and should be eliminated - we can have structs on all targets.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How do we ever see SIMD base types being __Canon? I though these had to be value types.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will say that this is a bit of a mystery to me - it only happens during crossgen, and I've only observed it on a
GT_RET_EXPR
(which is the importer case that was incorrectly setting the flag).