Error in CI `Mono llvmfullaot Pri0 Runtime Tests Run Linux arm64 release` #60234

BruceForstall · 2021-10-10T20:30:55Z

in LLVM AOT cross-compile CoreCLR tests

Error message:
##[error]Exit code 137 returned from process: file name '/usr/bin/docker', arguments 'exec -i -u 1000 -w /home/cloudtest_azpcontainer 12e65458950cdcacb35a892c9bd140157953823f62a984dfc4c13e1632863c42 /__a/externals/node/bin/node /__w/_temp/containerHandlerInvoker.js'.

https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_build/results?buildId=1411090&view=logs&j=b40c4ee0-d59d-50cb-cee3-6c499edc769b&t=24038e5f-e5d5-5f4a-9cc0-31eac914e6d6

Is this a real error or infrastructure/random? Is it known? What is the actual problem?

@dotnet/runtime-infrastructure

Runfo Tracking Issue: LLVM AOT build gets killed under docker

Definition	Build	Kind	Job Name
runtime	1569424	PR 63800	Mono llvmfullaot Pri0 Runtime Tests Run Linux arm64 release
runtime	1553349	PR 63800	Mono llvmfullaot Pri0 Runtime Tests Run Linux arm64 release
runtime	1551116	PR 63689	Mono llvmfullaot Pri0 Runtime Tests Run Linux arm64 release

Build Result Summary

Day Hit Count	Week Hit Count	Month Hit Count
1	1	3

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

ghost · 2021-10-10T20:30:57Z

Tagging subscribers to this area: @directhex
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

in LLVM AOT cross-compile CoreCLR tests

Error message:
##[error]Exit code 137 returned from process: file name '/usr/bin/docker', arguments 'exec -i -u 1000 -w /home/cloudtest_azpcontainer 12e65458950cdcacb35a892c9bd140157953823f62a984dfc4c13e1632863c42 /__a/externals/node/bin/node /__w/_temp/containerHandlerInvoker.js'.

https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_build/results?buildId=1411090&view=logs&j=b40c4ee0-d59d-50cb-cee3-6c499edc769b&t=24038e5f-e5d5-5f4a-9cc0-31eac914e6d6

Is this a real error or infrastructure/random? Is it known? What is the actual problem?

@dotnet/runtime-infrastructure

Author:	BruceForstall
Assignees:	-
Labels:	`area-Infrastructure-mono`
Milestone:	-

BruceForstall · 2021-10-10T20:31:14Z

Failure from this PR: #60192

agocke · 2021-10-18T19:42:46Z

This is failing almost every runtime build @directhex @steveisok

steveisok · 2021-10-18T20:24:55Z

I've seen this pop up w/ wasm runs. Most likely some kind of OOM. We should take the leg down until we come up with a fix/workaround.

Addresses dotnet#60234 Suspicion is that we're hitting some kind of OOM error within docker. Unblocks CI while we investigate.

lambdageek · 2021-10-18T20:39:37Z

The last 3 (as of right now) (and some randomly clicked older) runs from the runfo list all fail when AOTing Microsoft.Diagnostics.Tracing.TraceEvent.dll

aot-compile: compiling /__w/2/s/artifacts/tests/coreclr/Linux.arm64.Release/Tests/Core_Root/Microsoft.Diagnostics.Tracing.TraceEvent.dll; MONO_PATH: /__w/2/s/artifacts/tests/coreclr/Linux.arm64.Release/Tests/Core_Root:/__w/2/s/artifacts/tests/coreclr/Linux.arm64.Release/Tests/Core_Root

Is that one unexpectedly large?

hoyosjs · 2021-10-18T21:39:35Z

cc: @josalem for AOT of TraceEvent

Addresses #60234 Suspicion is that we're hitting some kind of OOM error within docker. Unblocks CI while we investigate. Co-authored-by: Steve Pfister <[email protected]>

josalem · 2021-10-22T17:14:05Z

Saw an interesting one where it's failing to locate DiaSymReader for compiling ReadyToRun binaries:
https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_build/results?buildId=1434785&view=logs&j=d631b51d-8d68-5da3-5a13-95f6a763c7bb&t=800563d8-8639-597e-b5b2-a98a874df5bf&l=28344

 Mono Ahead of Time compiler - compiling assembly /__w/2/s/artifacts/tests/coreclr/Linux.arm64.Release/Tests/Core_Root/ILCompiler.TypeSystem.ReadyToRun.dll
  AOTID 8FE1236D-0DB8-5A35-FB2C-8F1305E04CD5
  Could not load signature of Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader:.ctor due to: Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.DiaSymReader, Version=1.3.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies.
  Could not load signature of Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader:GetUrl due to: Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.DiaSymReader, Version=1.3.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies.
  Could not load signature of Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader:ProbeScopeForLocals due to: Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.DiaSymReader, Version=1.3.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies.
  Could not load signature of Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader:.ctor due to: Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.DiaSymReader, Version=1.3.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies.
  Could not load signature of Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader:GetUrl due to: Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.DiaSymReader, Version=1.3.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies.
  Could not load signature of Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader:ProbeScopeForLocals due to: Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.DiaSymReader, Version=1.3.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies.
  Unable to compile method 'void Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader:.cctor ()' due to: 'Could not resolve field token 0x040002f6, due to: Could not load type of field 'Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader:s_symBinder' (1) due to: Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.DiaSymReader, Version=1.3.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. assembly:/__w/2/s/artifacts/tests/coreclr/Linux.arm64.Release/Tests/Core_Root/ILCompiler.TypeSystem.ReadyToRun.dll type:UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader member:(null)'.
  Unable to compile method 'Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.PdbSymbolReader Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader:TryOpenSymbolReaderForMetadataFile (string,string)' due to: 'Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.DiaSymReader, Version=1.3.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies.'.
  Unable to compile method 'void Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader:Dispose ()' due to: 'Could not resolve field token 0x040002f8, due to: Could not load type of field 'Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader:s_symBinder' (1) due to: Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.DiaSymReader, Version=1.3.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. assembly:/__w/2/s/artifacts/tests/coreclr/Linux.arm64.Release/Tests/Core_Root/ILCompiler.TypeSystem.ReadyToRun.dll type:UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader member:(null)'.
  Unable to compile method 'System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable`1<Internal.IL.ILLocalVariable> Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader:GetLocalVariableNamesForMethod (int)' due to: 'Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.DiaSymReader, Version=1.3.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies.'.
  Unable to compile method 'void Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader/<GetSequencePointsForMethod>d__15:.ctor (int)' due to: 'Could not resolve field token 0x040003c5, due to: Invalid type Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader for instance field Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader+<GetSequencePointsForMethod>d__15:<>4__this assembly:/__w/2/s/artifacts/tests/coreclr/Linux.arm64.Release/Tests/Core_Root/ILCompiler.TypeSystem.ReadyToRun.dll type:<GetSequencePointsForMethod>d__15 member:(null)'.
  Unable to compile method 'bool Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader/<GetSequencePointsForMethod>d__15:MoveNext ()' due to: 'Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.DiaSymReader, Version=1.3.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies.'.
  Unable to compile method 'Internal.IL.ILSequencePoint Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader/<GetSequencePointsForMethod>d__15:System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerator<Internal.IL.ILSequencePoint>.get_Current ()' due to: 'Could not resolve field token 0x040003c6, due to: Invalid type Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader for instance field Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader+<GetSequencePointsForMethod>d__15:<>4__this assembly:/__w/2/s/artifacts/tests/coreclr/Linux.arm64.Release/Tests/Core_Root/ILCompiler.TypeSystem.ReadyToRun.dll type:<GetSequencePointsForMethod>d__15 member:(null)'.
  Unable to compile method 'object Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader/<GetSequencePointsForMethod>d__15:System.Collections.IEnumerator.get_Current ()' due to: 'Could not resolve field token 0x040003c6, due to: Invalid type Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader for instance field Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader+<GetSequencePointsForMethod>d__15:<>4__this assembly:/__w/2/s/artifacts/tests/coreclr/Linux.arm64.Release/Tests/Core_Root/ILCompiler.TypeSystem.ReadyToRun.dll type:<GetSequencePointsForMethod>d__15 member:(null)'.
  Unable to compile method 'System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerator`1<Internal.IL.ILSequencePoint> Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader/<GetSequencePointsForMethod>d__15:System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Internal.IL.ILSequencePoint>.GetEnumerator ()' due to: 'Could not resolve field token 0x040003c5, due to: Invalid type Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader for instance field Internal.TypeSystem.Ecma.UnmanagedPdbSymbolReader+<GetSequencePointsForMethod>d__15:<>4__this assembly:/__w/2/s/artifacts/tests/coreclr/Linux.arm64.Release/Tests/Core_Root/ILCompiler.TypeSystem.ReadyToRun.dll type:<GetSequencePointsForMethod>d__15 member:(null)'.

krwq · 2021-10-25T13:26:07Z

Removing blocking-clean-ci label because the legs are disabled

SamMonoRT · 2021-10-25T15:55:27Z

Who is investigating the actual cause of the OOM issue ?

steveisok · 2021-10-26T18:13:45Z

I think it would be better to tweak docker and see if that helps fix the problem. @MattGal suggested tweaking vm.overcommit_memory to start.

steveisok · 2021-10-26T18:47:27Z

@MattGal doesn't vm.overcommit_memory have to be set on the host?

MattGal · 2021-10-27T17:36:50Z

@MattGal doesn't vm.overcommit_memory have to be set on the host?

Oops, yeah I think that may be true. If you can comfortably change the pipeline to drive docker itself that would be allowed to be set on the host... @MichaelSimons / @mthalman may have some suggestions how this could be achieved best.

mthalman · 2021-10-27T21:30:57Z

If you can comfortably change the pipeline to drive docker itself that would be allowed to be set on the host... @MichaelSimons / @mthalman may have some suggestions how this could be achieved best.

I'm not understanding the request here. How "what" could be best achieved?

steveisok · 2021-11-09T14:59:09Z

If you can comfortably change the pipeline to drive docker itself that would be allowed to be set on the host... @MichaelSimons / @mthalman may have some suggestions how this could be achieved best.

I'm not understanding the request here. How "what" could be best achieved?

The what in this case is being able to tweak the docker host setting vm.overcommit_memory in the pipeline we have. We currently don't have any way to do this nor any insight into how.

mthalman · 2021-11-09T16:20:13Z

The what in this case is being able to tweak the docker host setting vm.overcommit_memory in the pipeline we have. We currently don't have any way to do this nor any insight into how.

Ok. I don't have any experience with the pipelines that are used in this repo so I can't comment on how to best execute logic on the host. Is the problem that the hook points you have available to you are running within the container?

steveisok · 2021-11-09T16:36:39Z

Yeah, I believe that's the case.

steveisok · 2021-11-10T02:00:43Z

@MattGal @mthalman This seems a bit uncertain. I think I would prefer bumping the machine memory. What options do we have?

MattGal · 2021-11-10T18:16:55Z

@MattGal @mthalman This seems a bit uncertain. I think I would prefer bumping the machine memory. What options do we have?

Not sure I completely follow:

If you mean making the host just have more memory, this is probably a non-starter; we always use 4-core, 16 GB RAM machines which is generally plenty for most builds, and the next size up represents a doubling in per-machine cost regardless of processor brand. Since 1ES pool provider machines are homogenous (all the same SKU / size) this would have to happen for the entire pool provider.
If you would like to have the image configured differently, this is absolutely possible; make an issue in dotnet/core-eng specifying what you're asking for, apply the "first responders" label, and we'll see what we can do.

One final option, though ugly, would be to just drive docker directly from the build instead of specifying a build within a container. This lets you set all sorts of interesting settings from the outside, but handling getting files in and out, mounting volumes, etc becomes your build's problem so this should definitely be considered a last-resort option.

BruceForstall added the area-Infrastructure-mono label Oct 10, 2021

dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Oct 10, 2021

agocke added blocking-clean-ci Blocking PR or rolling runs of 'runtime' or 'runtime-extra-platforms' and removed untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner labels Oct 18, 2021

runfoapp bot mentioned this issue Oct 18, 2021

Infrastructure - Status/Health #702

Closed

steveisok pushed a commit to steveisok/runtime that referenced this issue Oct 18, 2021

Disable Linux arm64 llvm full aot runtime tests

29507cb

Addresses dotnet#60234 Suspicion is that we're hitting some kind of OOM error within docker. Unblocks CI while we investigate.

steveisok mentioned this issue Oct 18, 2021

Disable Linux arm64 llvm full aot runtime tests #60576

Merged

hoyosjs mentioned this issue Oct 19, 2021

Build error 'The following files are missing entries in the templated manifest' #60580

Merged

safern mentioned this issue Oct 20, 2021

Cleanup workloads for testing logic #60652

Merged

krwq removed the blocking-clean-ci Blocking PR or rolling runs of 'runtime' or 'runtime-extra-platforms' label Oct 25, 2021

steveisok self-assigned this Oct 26, 2021

directhex added a commit to directhex/runtime that referenced this issue Jan 12, 2022

Extremely experimental, possibly criminal, workaround for dotnet#60234

a7a583e

steveisok assigned directhex and unassigned steveisok Jan 13, 2022

directhex mentioned this issue Jan 14, 2022

Restrict parallelism in LLVM FullAOT compile, to prevent OOM #63800

Merged

ghost added the in-pr There is an active PR which will close this issue when it is merged label Jan 14, 2022

directhex closed this as completed in #63800 Jan 25, 2022

ghost removed the in-pr There is an active PR which will close this issue when it is merged label Jan 25, 2022

ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 25, 2022

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Error in CI `Mono llvmfullaot Pri0 Runtime Tests Run Linux arm64 release` #60234

Error in CI `Mono llvmfullaot Pri0 Runtime Tests Run Linux arm64 release` #60234

BruceForstall commented Oct 10, 2021 •

edited by runfoapp bot

Loading

ghost commented Oct 10, 2021

BruceForstall commented Oct 10, 2021

agocke commented Oct 18, 2021

steveisok commented Oct 18, 2021

lambdageek commented Oct 18, 2021 •

edited

Loading

hoyosjs commented Oct 18, 2021

josalem commented Oct 22, 2021

krwq commented Oct 25, 2021

SamMonoRT commented Oct 25, 2021

steveisok commented Oct 26, 2021

steveisok commented Oct 26, 2021

MattGal commented Oct 27, 2021 •

edited

Loading

mthalman commented Oct 27, 2021

steveisok commented Nov 9, 2021 •

edited

Loading

mthalman commented Nov 9, 2021

steveisok commented Nov 9, 2021

steveisok commented Nov 10, 2021

MattGal commented Nov 10, 2021 •

edited

Loading

Error in CI Mono llvmfullaot Pri0 Runtime Tests Run Linux arm64 release #60234

Error in CI Mono llvmfullaot Pri0 Runtime Tests Run Linux arm64 release #60234

Comments

BruceForstall commented Oct 10, 2021 • edited by runfoapp bot Loading

ghost commented Oct 10, 2021

BruceForstall commented Oct 10, 2021

agocke commented Oct 18, 2021

steveisok commented Oct 18, 2021

lambdageek commented Oct 18, 2021 • edited Loading

hoyosjs commented Oct 18, 2021

josalem commented Oct 22, 2021

krwq commented Oct 25, 2021

SamMonoRT commented Oct 25, 2021

steveisok commented Oct 26, 2021

steveisok commented Oct 26, 2021

MattGal commented Oct 27, 2021 • edited Loading

mthalman commented Oct 27, 2021

steveisok commented Nov 9, 2021 • edited Loading

mthalman commented Nov 9, 2021

steveisok commented Nov 9, 2021

steveisok commented Nov 10, 2021

MattGal commented Nov 10, 2021 • edited Loading

Error in CI `Mono llvmfullaot Pri0 Runtime Tests Run Linux arm64 release` #60234

Error in CI `Mono llvmfullaot Pri0 Runtime Tests Run Linux arm64 release` #60234

BruceForstall commented Oct 10, 2021 •

edited by runfoapp bot

Loading

lambdageek commented Oct 18, 2021 •

edited

Loading

MattGal commented Oct 27, 2021 •

edited

Loading

steveisok commented Nov 9, 2021 •

edited

Loading

MattGal commented Nov 10, 2021 •

edited

Loading