DRAFT prototype for 16167 #16268
Closed
DRAFT prototype for 16167 #16268
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Possible approach for fixing dotnet#16195
gafter
added
Area-Compilers
PR For Personal Review Only
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Possible approach for fixing #16167
@AlekseyTs I'd like your opinion about this approach for addressing the bug underlying #16195, which is that we currently do not give any scope to variables declared in default parameter values of local function declarations. If you think this is a reasonable approach, I'll complete the work based on this direction. If not, what would you recommend?