Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2023. It is now read-only.
/ corefx Public archive

Fix UpdateBlobs regression, reenabling ValueTuple tests on Core, add Dictionary<string,string> serialization test case #24962

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 3, 2017

Conversation

ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member

@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer commented Oct 30, 2017

Related #24962

The UpdateBlobs method which is manually triggered requires the netfx conditioned test cases to be at the end of the MemberData method. Otherwise it will replace wrong blobs.

@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer force-pushed the ValueTupleUpdateBlobs branch from 47b5971 to fec5755 Compare October 31, 2017 17:33
@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member Author

cc @jkotas this PR contains the test case for Dictionary<string, string>. I also added an explanation why the type forward for NonRandomizedStringEqualityComparer is still needed.

@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer changed the title Fix UpdateBlobs regression, reenabling ValueTuple tests on Core Fix UpdateBlobs regression, reenabling ValueTuple tests on Core, add Dictionary<string,string> serialization test case Oct 31, 2017
@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member Author

Requires coreclr change

@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member Author

@dotnet-bot test this please

@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer merged commit b2dcf2c into dotnet:master Nov 3, 2017
@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer deleted the ValueTupleUpdateBlobs branch November 3, 2017 15:42
ViktorHofer added a commit to ViktorHofer/corefx that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2017
…Dictionary<string,string> serialization test case (dotnet#24962)

* Fix UpdateBlobs regression, reenabling ValueTuple tests on Core

* Add Dictionary<string,string> serialization test case
ViktorHofer added a commit to ViktorHofer/corefx that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2017
…Dictionary<string,string> serialization test case (dotnet#24962)

* Fix UpdateBlobs regression, reenabling ValueTuple tests on Core

* Add Dictionary<string,string> serialization test case
ViktorHofer added a commit to ViktorHofer/corefx that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2017
…Dictionary<string,string> serialization test case (dotnet#24962)

* Fix UpdateBlobs regression, reenabling ValueTuple tests on Core

* Add Dictionary<string,string> serialization test case
ViktorHofer added a commit to ViktorHofer/corefx that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2017
…Dictionary<string,string> serialization test case (dotnet#24962)

* Fix UpdateBlobs regression, reenabling ValueTuple tests on Core

* Add Dictionary<string,string> serialization test case
ViktorHofer added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2017
…rds (#25047)

* Make corefx exceptions serializable and add typeforwards (#24427)

* Add serializable attribute and typeforward and adding serialization impl
* Expose ZLibException in impl assembly
* Remove deserialization negative tests
* Adding tests for exceptions
* Adding SqlError data to base exception data table
* System Data Facade
* Add netfx471 blob diffs for Hashtable and ListDictionary
* Build Microsoft.NETCore.App.deps.json after manual shims
* Disable currently failing uap/uapaot tests because of shim assembly load errors

* Cleanup code in System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Tests (#23940)

* Cleanup code in System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Tests

* Moved UnitySerializationHolder serialization test to System.Runtime.Tests

* Fix UpdateBlobs regression, reenabling ValueTuple tests on Core, add Dictionary<string,string> serialization test case (#24962)

* Update non NetCoreApp package versions and build them
picenka21 pushed a commit to picenka21/runtime that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2022
…Dictionary<string,string> serialization test case (dotnet/corefx#24962)

* Fix UpdateBlobs regression, reenabling ValueTuple tests on Core

* Add Dictionary<string,string> serialization test case


Commit migrated from dotnet/corefx@b2dcf2c
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants