Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump to mono/2017-04/7cc3aca0 #611

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2017

Conversation

@jonpryor jonpryor added the full-mono-integration-build For PRs; run a full build (~6-10h for mono bumps), not the faster PR subset (~2h for mono bumps) label May 26, 2017
@jonpryor
Copy link
Member Author

build

1 similar comment
@jonpryor
Copy link
Member Author

build

@jonpryor jonpryor merged commit 9ab942a into dotnet:master May 27, 2017
jonpryor added a commit to jonpryor/xamarin-android that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2020
Changes: dotnet/java-interop@1a086ff...56c92c7

  * dotnet/java-interop@56c92c7: [build] Remove cecil submodule (dotnet#597)
  * dotnet/java-interop@3091274: [build] Provide a default $(Configuration) value (dotnet#612)
  * dotnet/java-interop@cf3e7c2: [generator] Don't process duplicate reference assemblies (dotnet#611)
  * dotnet/java-interop@f5fa462: [jnienv-gen] Convert to SDK-style (dotnet#608)
jonpryor added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2020
Changes: dotnet/java-interop@1a086ff...56c92c7

  * dotnet/java-interop@56c92c7: [build] Remove cecil submodule (#597)
  * dotnet/java-interop@3091274: [build] Provide a default $(Configuration) value (#612)
  * dotnet/java-interop@cf3e7c2: [generator] Don't process duplicate reference assemblies (#611)
  * dotnet/java-interop@f5fa462: [jnienv-gen] Convert to SDK-style (#608)

Of particular note is [dotnet/java-interop@56c92c7][0], which
replaces the `mono/cecil` submodule within Java.Interop with the
[`Mono.Cecil` NuGet package][1] in an effort to simplify the
Java.Interop build system.

This simplifies the Java.Interop repo, and we *thought* that since
xamarin-android *doesn't even use* Java.Interop's cecil submodule-built
`Mono.Cecil.dll` -- instead the `Mono.Cecil.dll` from the
"mono archive" is "renamed" to `Xamarin.Android.Cecil.dll` during
`make prepare` (0c9f83b) -- surely this would be a simple change.

The removal of the cecil submodule also required changing
`ThirdPartyNotice.txt` generation so that the LICENSE for Cecil was
obtained from the mono archive instead of from Java.Interop.

Unfortunately, the integration was a tad more complicated than
anticipated.  With the ongoing adoption of MSBuild multi-targeting
and builds against the `netcoreapp3.1` target framework -- commit
e2854ee and numerous commits in Java.Interop -- we encountered a
problem with MSBuild semantics: If two `$(TargetFramework)` builds
share the same output directory, the `IncrementalClean` target will
*remove files created by previous builds*, e.g. when e.g.
`Java.Interop/tools/generator.csproj` builds the `netcoreapp3.1`
framework, it will *delete* the `generator.exe` built by the `net472`
framework, which results in subsequent build breaks.

The only path to sanity is to *ensure* that different
`$(TargetFramework)` builds have *completely separate* `$(OutputPath)`
values.  The "normal" approach to doing this is for `$(OutputPath)`
to end with `$(TargetFramework)`, which is the case when
`$(AppendTargetFrameworkToOutputPath)`=True (the default).

Unfortunately in xamarin-android we don't want `$(OutputPath)` to end
with `$(TargetFramework)`; we want the build tree structure to mirror
the installation directory structure, which -- at present -- doesn't
mention `$(TargetFramework)` at all.

The solution here is to use "non-overlapping" directories.  For
example, in e2854ee there are "two" `$(OutputPath)` values:

  * `MonoAndroid10.0`: `bin/Debug/lib/xamarin.android/xbuild-frameworks/MonoAndroid/v10.0/Mono.Android.dll`
  *   `netcoreapp3.1`: `bin/Debug/lib/xamarin.android/xbuild-frameworks/Xamarin.Android.App/netcoreapp3.1/Mono.Android.dll`

The same "non-overlapping directories" strategy needs to be extended
to *all* multi-targeted projects from Java.Interop, *including*
dependencies.  Dependencies such as `Xamarin.Android.Cecil.dll`.

Define a new `$(UtilityOutputFullPathCoreApps)` MSBuild property so
that Java.Interop "utility" project builds, when building for the
`netcoreapp3.1` framework, use a *different* `Xamarin.Android.Cecil.dll`
than is used with the `net472`-related builds.

Update `xaprepare` to *create* this new `netcoreapp3.1`-correlated
`Xamarin.Android.Cecil.dll`.  It's the same file, just in a different
directory, to prevent "accidental" deletes by `IncrementalClean`.

Even with all that, MSBuild still had other ideas.  In particular,
MSBuild wasn't particularly happy about our attempt to use the
`$(UtilityOutputFullPath)` property to "switch" between using a
`@(PackageReference)` to the Mono.Cecil NuGet package vs. using a
`@(Reference)` to the `Xamarin.Android.Cecil.dll` assembly, because
MSBuild *caches* this information somewhere within `obj` directories.

To get MSBuild to re-evaluate it's assembly reference choices, we must
instead replace `msbuild` with `msbuild /restore`.

Which still isn't enough, because some of our MSBuild invocations are
via the `<MSBuild/>` task, within `msbuild`.  To get *that* working,
we need to explicitly invoke the `Restore` target through a *separate*
`<MSBuild/>` task invocation.  You ***CANNOT*** use
`<MSBuild Targets="Restore;Build" />`, as "obvious" as that may be,
because it [doesn't work reliably][2].  ([Yet.][3])

[0]: dotnet/java-interop@56c92c7
[1]: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Mono.Cecil/0.11.2
[2]: dotnet/msbuild#3000 (comment)
[3]: dotnet/msbuild#2811
@gmck gmck mentioned this pull request Dec 6, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 2, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
full-mono-integration-build For PRs; run a full build (~6-10h for mono bumps), not the faster PR subset (~2h for mono bumps)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants