Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanup the "in tuple" check #49

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2022
Merged

Cleanup the "in tuple" check #49

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2022

Conversation

dosisod
Copy link
Owner

@dosisod dosisod commented Oct 5, 2022

Changes:

  • Remove the "performance" note from the --explain docs since the performance is the same in both cases, and instead say that it is for style/consistency.

  • Add support for parsing not in expressions.

  • Update message to use the "replace x with y" format.

Closes #44

* Remove the "performance" note from the --explain docs since the performance
is the same in both cases, and instead say that it is for style/consistency.

* Add support for parsing `not in` expressions.

* Update message to use the "replace x with y" format.
@dosisod dosisod self-assigned this Oct 5, 2022
@dosisod dosisod merged commit 28480c3 into master Oct 5, 2022
@dosisod dosisod deleted the update-in-tuple branch October 5, 2022 22:32
@dosisod dosisod mentioned this pull request Aug 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

FURB109 explanation is technically incorrect
1 participant