Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CMSSW_13_0_7_patch1 replay with new GTs #4838

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

CMSSW_13_0_7_patch1 replay with new GTs #4838

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

LinaresToine
Copy link
Contributor

@LinaresToine LinaresToine commented Jun 8, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Replay Request

Requestor
ORM @sarafiorendi

Describe the configuration

  • Release: CMSSW_13_0_7_patch1
  • Run: 368389
  • GTs:
    • Exxpress global tag: 130X_dataRun3_Express_v3
    • Prompt global tag: 130X_dataRun3_Prompt_v4

@LinaresToine
Copy link
Contributor Author

test syntax please

@LinaresToine
Copy link
Contributor Author

run replay please

1 similar comment
@LinaresToine
Copy link
Contributor Author

run replay please

@dmwm dmwm deleted a comment from cmsdmwmbot Jun 8, 2023
@dmwm dmwm deleted a comment from cmsdmwmbot Jun 8, 2023
@cmsdmwmbot
Copy link

Replay testing PR 'CMSSW_13_0_7_patch1 replay with new GTs'
An automatic replay has been requested by LinaresToine.
Deployment ID: 230608154216
Github PR: #4838
PR author: LinaresToine
Requestor: None
Injected runs: 367907
CMSSW release: CMSSW_13_0_7_patch1
Tier0 release: 3.0.8
ppScenario: ppEra_Run3_2023
Tier0 Config: https://cmst0.web.cern.ch/CMST0/tier0/offline_config/ReplayOfflineConfiguration_047.php
Contatiner ID: 1
Jenkins Build: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/dmwm-jenkins/job/DMWM-T0-PR-test-job/540/
Jira Issue : https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/CMSTZDEV-779

@LinaresToine
Copy link
Contributor Author

Replay for run 368389 was successful. The output data is found in this link

@malbouis
Copy link
Contributor

malbouis commented Jun 9, 2023 •
edited
Loading

@vlimant , @simonepigazzini

I understand you guys have checked already that the content of the NanoAOD has the L1T objects in.

This was referenced Jun 13, 2023
Merged
Merged
Merged
@germanfgv germanfgv mentioned this pull request Jun 25, 2023
Merged
@germanfgv
Copy link
Contributor

Merging this in #4844

@germanfgv germanfgv closed this Jun 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@LinaresToine @cmsdmwmbot @malbouis @germanfgv