Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

History button reworked #183

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 30, 2024
Merged

History button reworked #183

merged 8 commits into from
May 30, 2024

Conversation

dlemmermann
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

HistoryButton now includes a Node owner parameter, enabling it to be reactive to the focus state of its own parent node. HistoryButton is now linked to its parent node for focus management. The forward-referenced HistoryButton constructor on SearchField and SearchTextField classes, have been updated to include the respective 'this' reference as the owner.
Renamed 'onRemoveAction' method to 'removeItem' and updated the method implementation to improve user interface visibility and event handling. Also included construction documentation for new cells and made some changes to properties binding for proper interaction with visibility and manageability of the cell.
@dlemmermann dlemmermann requested a review from leewyatt May 30, 2024 14:11
Removed the unused constant DEFAULT_ENABLE_HISTORY_POPUP in the SearchField class to improve code readability and maintenance. This deletion ensures better performance by eliminating unnecessary statements.
@leewyatt
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your pr. This elegant and minimalist design is something I should learn from.

@dlemmermann dlemmermann merged commit ae71050 into master May 30, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants