-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 459
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for eclipse 4.13 #482
Changes from 5 commits
8f167b8
1260246
85e2f33
02e3223
1b8ef41
ce6662f
d4d01bf
6c452fe
0b00d79
d1c8512
8c55363
1c4cb71
4b63e09
15b33b6
e4ee903
1ad30a8
0309d60
008ac4f
7b249b9
3c86339
52a1d95
75f32f9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | ||
# Versions correspond to the Eclipse-CDT version used for the fat-JAR. | ||
# See https://www.eclipse.org/cdt/ for further information about Eclipse-CDT versions. | ||
# Patch version can be incremented independently for backward compatible patches of this library. | ||
ext_version=9.8.0 | ||
ext_version=9.9.0 | ||
ext_artifactId=spotless-eclipse-cdt | ||
ext_description=Eclipse's CDT C/C++ formatter bundled for Spotless | ||
ext_org=diffplug | ||
|
@@ -11,11 +11,10 @@ ext_group=com.diffplug.spotless | |
ext_VER_JAVA=1.8 | ||
|
||
# Compile dependencies | ||
VER_ECLIPSE_CDT=9.7 | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm wondering if this was a bug in the eclipse-cdt release of 9.8, as it referenced 9.7 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Good catch! I looked at it, and I believe you are correct. I should publish a There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks for the fix. I really missed to commit the vital change. |
||
VER_SPOTLESS_ECLISPE_BASE=[3.2.0,4.0.0[ | ||
VER_ECLISPE_JFACE=[3.12.0,4.0.0[ | ||
VER_ECLISPE_WORKBENCH=[3.11.0,4.0.0[ | ||
VER_ECLISPE_PLATFORM=[3.6.0,4.0.0[ | ||
VER_ECLIPSE_CDT=9.9 | ||
VER_SPOTLESS_ECLISPE_BASE=[3.3.0,4.0.0[ | ||
VER_ECLISPE_JFACE=[3.15.300,4.0.0[ | ||
VER_ECLISPE_PLATFORM=[3.6.700,4.0.0[ | ||
VER_IBM_ICU=[61,62[ | ||
|
||
# Provided dependencies | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we don't change the code in
eclipse-base
, then we don't need to publish a neweclipse-base
. We only change this when something about the OSGi plumbing needs to change, which is generally rare.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was under the impression that the compile-scoped dependencies were included in the fat jar, but if that is incorrect, then I can back this and the related changes out.
Are you OK with me rewriting these commits to suit, or would you prefer new commits?