Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix referentially opaque Prelude test #781

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 26, 2019
Merged

Conversation

Gabriella439
Copy link
Contributor

The deleted test causes the Prelude to fail when imported remotely
due to failing the referential sanity check.

The right solution here is to make missing a valid transitive import
for remote imports, but this is a quick fix to restore Prelude
functionality until then.

The deleted test causes the Prelude to fail when imported remotely
due to failing the referential sanity check.

The right solution here is to make `missing` a valid transitive import
for remote imports, but this is a quick fix to restore Prelude
functionality until then.
akshaymankar pushed a commit to akshaymankar/dhall-concourse that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2019
* No need to specially depend on JSON type
* Use grabriel/fix_Prelude untile this is merged dhall-lang/dhall-lang#781
@Gabriella439
Copy link
Contributor Author

@f-f @singpolyma: Could you review this quickly when you have the chance? This breaks https://prelude.dhall-lang.org/package.dhall at the moment and I'd like to cut an 11.1.0 point release to fix this

Copy link
Member

@f-f f-f left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! 🙂

@amarrella
Copy link

Can we get a release of this one? :)

@Gabriella439
Copy link
Contributor Author

@amarrella: I think it's a case of where the contributing process is ambiguous here: it doesn't specify if a change requires a unanimous vote or a majority vote to be merged early (i.e. after 3 days). I have always been interpreting it to mean a unanimous vote (at least, for my own contributions), but if people don't object I can relax it to a majority vote and go ahead and merge.

@amarrella
Copy link

amarrella commented Oct 24, 2019

@Gabriel439: No worries, I'm happy to wait the 3 days, I'm just using this to warm a cache so no need to relax the rules :)

@Gabriella439 Gabriella439 merged commit 150e82c into master Oct 26, 2019
@Gabriella439 Gabriella439 deleted the gabriel/fix_Prelude branch October 26, 2019 01:06
Gabriella439 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2019
TristanCacqueray pushed a commit to TristanCacqueray/dhall-lang that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2025
A refactor of the Nix build accidentally removed the `-Werror` flag, which
caused some warnings to get past CI.  This change fixes that and removes the
warnings.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants