-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: secp256k1 account #2598
Merged
Merged
feat: secp256k1 account #2598
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8386e4f
Initialise a secp256k1 account with ICP
bitdivine 724ed4b
fmt
bitdivine ff1faf6
changelog++
bitdivine d1cf191
Fix identity import
bitdivine 091dd28
Add key to changelog
bitdivine 4dcd051
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into ident1-icp
bitdivine File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
-----BEGIN EC PRIVATE KEY----- | ||
MHQCAQEEICJxApEbuZznKFpV+VKACRK30i6+7u5Z13/DOl18cIC+oAcGBSuBBAAK | ||
oUQDQgAEPas6Iag4TUx+Uop+3NhE6s3FlayFtbwdhRVjvOar0kPTfE/N8N6btRnd | ||
74ly5xXEBNSXiENyxhEuzOZrIWMCNQ== | ||
-----END EC PRIVATE KEY----- |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about using the anonymous identity for this? It's present for all dfx installations already so the key doesn't have to be imported
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This way normal API calls can be used. In this PR the secp256k1 key matches the existing ed25519 account (5b...), where it is also the case that code needs to have and use the secret key explicitly. It is a "no magic" philosophy. That said, if we did initialize the anonymous identity with ICP, how would this work? What is the account ID of the anonymous identity and what dfx call would transfer funds from the anonymous identity to another? Does the anonymous account use secp256k1? I mean, there might well be a use case for giving the anonymous ID funds but we would probably want to check the ramifications. In the case of the pre-populated ed25519 the account can be, and is, used like any other account. The idea was to do the same here. We can change the current approach but is that what we want?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NVM, I stand corrected: I just tried it out, and the anonymous principal did receive ICP, but is not allowed to send:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting. Thank you for looking. I didn't know about
dfx --identity anonymous
. It is in the docs example ofdfx identity list
. That could be useful.