Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(dfx-orbit): dfx-orbit version 0.4 #337

Merged
merged 76 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024
Merged

feat(dfx-orbit): dfx-orbit version 0.4 #337

merged 76 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024

Conversation

Sawchord
Copy link
Collaborator

@Sawchord Sawchord commented Sep 3, 2024

This PR adds a new version of dfx-orbit.

Features

Orbit Request Redesign

  • All requests are prefixed with dfx-orbit request
  • Requests are paired with dfx-orbit verify commands that can be used to verify requests, by recreating the arguments and checking whether it matches
  • --and-aprove --or-reject flags allow to approve / reject requests right away, if verify passes / fails

Display information improvements

  • All information outputs (dfx-orbit station show, dfx-orbit me, ...) now have textual (non-json) outputs.
  • This information leaves out redundant and unimportant information
  • Additional information is pulled from dfx.json and canister_ids.json (if available) to augment the report (e.g. reverse lookup principal names etc.)
  • Old output still available using --json flag

@Sawchord Sawchord marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2024 16:04
@Sawchord Sawchord requested review from mraszyk and a team as code owners September 3, 2024 16:04
@Sawchord Sawchord enabled auto-merge (squash) September 9, 2024 13:18
@Sawchord Sawchord merged commit 0159355 into main Sep 9, 2024
22 checks passed
@Sawchord Sawchord deleted the leon/dfx-orbitv0.4 branch September 9, 2024 13:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants