-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 357
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: experiment list sort [INFENG-766] #9675
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for determined-ui ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9675 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 53.32% 48.70% -4.63%
==========================================
Files 1254 931 -323
Lines 152655 123432 -29223
Branches 3244 3243 -1
==========================================
- Hits 81398 60113 -21285
+ Misses 71105 63167 -7938
Partials 152 152
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
// [ET-284] wait before popover close or else it'll flake | ||
await authedPage.waitForTimeout(1_000); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i'm wondering if there's a better way to wait for the page to settle other than adding a timeout. Menu state is debounced to keep the UI responsive for users -- while we're planning a fix to ensure the menu state is committed on close, waiting for a matching request should decrease the amount of time that the test is waiting.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
since the fix is planned, i think i'd rather just wait for the debounce to end for now. it'll be easy to delete the line later once the work gets done. i've got other stuff i need to focus on for now. thanks for approving
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i mean, it would also work for the current waitTableStable
stuff as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i just added it to my backlog. thanks for the suggestion
722437c
to
1019417
Compare
Ticket
INFENG-766
Description
This is the example I gave during my dev presentation. It's good to have this on main because we'll be closer to running correctly against shared environments.
Test Plan
Checklist
docs/release-notes/
See Release Note for details.