morpho blue sepolia config + generic library resolution/deployment

[mcclurejt]

Resolved Issues

• Uses MorphoBlue coordinator + instance to deploy integration on Sepolia
• Generic Library resolution in deployment functions (rather than specific configuration for each library)

Description

Review Checklists

Please check each item before approving the pull request. While going
through the checklist, it is recommended to leave comments on items that are
referenced in the checklist to make sure that they are reviewed. If there are
multiple reviewers, copy the checklists into sections titled ## [Reviewer Name].
If the PR doesn't touch Solidity, the corresponding checklist can
be removed.

[[Reviewer Name]]

• Tokens
  • Do all approve calls use forceApprove?
  • Do all transfer calls use safeTransfer?
  • Do all transferFrom calls use msg.sender as the from address?
    • If not, is the function access restricted to prevent unauthorized
      token spend?
• Low-level calls (call, delegatecall, staticcall, transfer, send)
  • Is the returned success boolean checked to handle failed calls?
  • If using delegatecall, are there strict access controls on the
    addresses that can be called? It shouldn't be possible to delegatecall
    arbitrary addresses, so the list of possible targets should either be
    immutable or tightly controlled by an admin.
• Reentrancy
  • Are functions that make external calls or transfer ether marked as nonReentrant?
    • If not, is there documentation that explains why reentrancy is
      not a concern or how it's mitigated?
• Gas Optimizations
  • Is the logic as simple as possible?
  • Are the storage values that are used repeatedly cached in stack or
    memory variables?
  • If loops are used, are there guards in place to avoid out-of-gas
    issues?
• Visibility
  • Are all payable functions restricted to avoid stuck ether?
• Math
  • Is all of the arithmetic checked or guarded by if-statements that will
    catch underflows?
  • If Safe functions are altered, are potential underflows and
    overflows caught so that a failure flag can be thrown?
  • Are all of the rounding directions clearly documented?
• Testing
  • Are there new or updated unit or integration tests?
  • Do the tests cover the happy paths?
  • Do the tests cover the unhappy paths?
  • Are there an adequate number of fuzz tests to ensure that we are
    covering the full input space?

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10079918579

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• 1 unchanged line in 1 file lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.01%) to 91.592%

---

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
contracts/src/external/Hyperdrive.sol	1	97.96%

Totals
Change from base Build 9991233897:	-0.01%
Covered Lines:	2146
Relevant Lines:	2343

---

💛 - Coveralls

[github-actions]

Hyperdrive Gas Benchmark

Benchmark suite	Current: 47d3e85	Previous: 2514eec	Deviation	Status
addLiquidity: min	33893 gas	33893 gas	0%	🟰
addLiquidity: avg	197444 gas	197021 gas	0.2147%	🚨
addLiquidity: max	474728 gas	474728 gas	0%	🟰
checkpoint: min	40316 gas	40316 gas	0%	🟰
checkpoint: avg	144490 gas	144541 gas	-0.0353%	✅
checkpoint: max	256108 gas	256108 gas	0%	🟰
closeLong: min	31384 gas	31384 gas	0%	🟰
closeLong: avg	135782 gas	135870 gas	-0.0648%	✅
closeLong: max	2539399 gas	2539399 gas	0%	🟰
closeShort: min	31327 gas	31327 gas	0%	🟰
closeShort: avg	131163 gas	131250 gas	-0.0663%	✅
closeShort: max	271250 gas	271250 gas	0%	🟰
initialize: min	31305 gas	31305 gas	0%	🟰
initialize: avg	352446 gas	352411 gas	0.0099%	🚨
initialize: max	418715 gas	418715 gas	0%	🟰
openLong: min	33370 gas	33370 gas	0%	🟰
openLong: avg	174030 gas	174194 gas	-0.0941%	✅
openLong: max	333715 gas	333715 gas	0%	🟰
openShort: min	33936 gas	33936 gas	0%	🟰
openShort: avg	174196 gas	174122 gas	0.0425%	🚨
openShort: max	415009 gas	414993 gas	0.0039%	🚨
redeemWithdrawalShares: min	31211 gas	31211 gas	0%	🟰
redeemWithdrawalShares: avg	74973 gas	75583 gas	-0.8071%	✅
redeemWithdrawalShares: max	305162 gas	305162 gas	0%	🟰
removeLiquidity: min	31217 gas	31217 gas	0%	🟰
removeLiquidity: avg	214763 gas	214398 gas	0.1702%	🚨
removeLiquidity: max	403566 gas	403566 gas	0%	🟰

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

[jalextowle]

Aside from the other comments that I left, we'll want to bump the version in contracts/src/libraries/Constants.sol so that we can ship a new release once this lands. Any chance you could work on the mainnet config so that I can deploy it after I review and get up in the morning?