Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Updated kube-rbac-proxy image to the one packaged by Redhat #697

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2024
Merged

Updated kube-rbac-proxy image to the one packaged by Redhat #697

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2024

Conversation

rajendraindukuri
Copy link
Collaborator

@rajendraindukuri rajendraindukuri commented Sep 23, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Description

Updated kube-rbac-proxy image to the repackaged by Redhat:
Existing image: gcr.io/kubebuilder/kube-rbac-proxy:v0.8.0
New image: registry.redhat.io/openshift4/ose-kube-rbac-proxy-rhel9:v4.16.0-202409051837.p0.g8ea2c99.assembly.stream.el9

GitHub Issues

List the GitHub issues impacted by this PR:

GitHub Issue #
dell/csm#1435

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code to ensure there are no formatting, vetting, linting, or security issues
  • I have verified that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have not allowed coverage numbers to degenerate
  • I have maintained at least 90% code coverage
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have maintained backward compatibility

How Has This Been Tested?

Did basic sanity by creating an image using these updates. Installed CSM Operator and created Unity CSM Object on top of that and brought up application pods with PVC s on that.. All looks good.

image
image
image

@rajendraindukuri rajendraindukuri force-pushed the update-kube-rbac-proxy-with-redhat-repackaged-iamge branch from 14b1788 to 0ab87a8 Compare September 23, 2024 09:57
@rajendraindukuri rajendraindukuri marked this pull request as ready for review September 23, 2024 10:05
shefali-malhotra
shefali-malhotra approved these changes Sep 23, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@shefali-malhotra shefali-malhotra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rajendraindukuri rajendraindukuri force-pushed the update-kube-rbac-proxy-with-redhat-repackaged-iamge branch from 0ab87a8 to d8d5d42 Compare September 24, 2024 04:28
@rajendraindukuri rajendraindukuri merged commit 03c907c into main Sep 24, 2024
7 checks passed
ChristianAtDell added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
@ChristianAtDell
Updated kube-rbac-proxy image to the one repackaged by Redhat (#697)
0d56c21
@mjsdell mjsdell deleted the update-kube-rbac-proxy-with-redhat-repackaged-iamge branch October 17, 2024 19:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@HarishH-DELL HarishH-DELL HarishH-DELL approved these changes

@shefali-malhotra shefali-malhotra shefali-malhotra approved these changes

@nitesh3108 nitesh3108 nitesh3108 approved these changes

@abhi16394 abhi16394 Awaiting requested review from abhi16394 abhi16394 is a code owner

@mbasha-dell mbasha-dell Awaiting requested review from mbasha-dell mbasha-dell is a code owner

@alikdell alikdell Awaiting requested review from alikdell alikdell is a code owner

@bharathsreekanth bharathsreekanth Awaiting requested review from bharathsreekanth bharathsreekanth is a code owner

@chimanjain chimanjain Awaiting requested review from chimanjain chimanjain is a code owner

@coulof coulof Awaiting requested review from coulof coulof is a code owner

@Deepak-Ghivari Deepak-Ghivari Awaiting requested review from Deepak-Ghivari Deepak-Ghivari is a code owner

@gallacher gallacher Awaiting requested review from gallacher gallacher is a code owner

@gilltaran gilltaran Awaiting requested review from gilltaran gilltaran is a code owner

@harishp8889 harishp8889 Awaiting requested review from harishp8889 harishp8889 is a code owner

@JacobGros JacobGros Awaiting requested review from JacobGros JacobGros is a code owner

@jooseppi-luna jooseppi-luna Awaiting requested review from jooseppi-luna jooseppi-luna is a code owner

@karthikk92 karthikk92 Awaiting requested review from karthikk92 karthikk92 is a code owner

@kumarkgosa kumarkgosa Awaiting requested review from kumarkgosa kumarkgosa is a code owner

@bandak2 bandak2 Awaiting requested review from bandak2 bandak2 is a code owner

@meggm meggm Awaiting requested review from meggm meggm is a code owner

@mgandharva mgandharva Awaiting requested review from mgandharva mgandharva is a code owner

@mjsdell mjsdell Awaiting requested review from mjsdell mjsdell is a code owner

@Prabhu-Dell Prabhu-Dell Awaiting requested review from Prabhu-Dell Prabhu-Dell is a code owner

@rajkumar-palani rajkumar-palani Awaiting requested review from rajkumar-palani rajkumar-palani is a code owner

@panigs7 panigs7 Awaiting requested review from panigs7 panigs7 is a code owner

@tdawe tdawe Awaiting requested review from tdawe tdawe is a code owner

@shaynafinocchiaro shaynafinocchiaro Awaiting requested review from shaynafinocchiaro shaynafinocchiaro is a code owner

@atye atye Awaiting requested review from atye atye is a code owner

@sharmilarama sharmilarama Awaiting requested review from sharmilarama sharmilarama is a code owner

@shanmydell shanmydell Awaiting requested review from shanmydell shanmydell is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@rajendraindukuri @nitesh3108 @shefali-malhotra @HarishH-DELL