Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update csm auth upgrade procedure #467

Merged

Conversation

rodrigobassil
Copy link

@rodrigobassil rodrigobassil commented Feb 20, 2023

Description

Upgraded CSM Authorization installation/upgrade documentation.

GitHub Issues

List the GitHub issues impacted by this PR:

| GitHub Issue # |
| dell/csm#642 |
| |

Checklist:

  • Have you run a grammar and spell checks against your submission?
  • Have you tested the changes locally?
  • Have you tested whether the hyperlinks are working properly?
  • Did you add the examples wherever applicable?
  • Have you added high-resolution images?

Copy link

@rsedlock1958 rsedlock1958 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have reviewed this. No grammatical edits are required.

@bharathsreekanth bharathsreekanth changed the title Krv 11287 update csm auth upgrade procedure Update csm auth upgrade procedure Feb 23, 2023
@rodrigobassil rodrigobassil merged commit 5d9c690 into release-1.6.0 Feb 23, 2023
@rodrigobassil rodrigobassil deleted the KRV_11287_update_csm_auth_upgrade_procedure branch February 23, 2023 12:57
rajkumar-palani pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2023
* Updated upgrade procedure to include traefik Nodeport option.

* Updated the relase notes.

* Updated documentation with new upgrade process and features for authorization.
rajkumar-palani pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2023
* Updated upgrade procedure to include traefik Nodeport option.

* Updated the relase notes.

* Updated documentation with new upgrade process and features for authorization.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants