Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(pt): add trainable to property fitting #4599

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2025

Conversation

ChiahsinChu
Copy link
Contributor

@ChiahsinChu ChiahsinChu commented Feb 16, 2025

Add keyword trainable to property fitting.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a configurable "trainable" option that allows users to control whether network parameters are updated individually or collectively.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced descriptions to clearly explain how the new trainability setting works.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 16, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request adds a new parameter, trainable, to control the trainability of the fitting network parameters. In the PropertyFittingNet class constructor, the parameter is defined as Union[bool, list[bool]] with a default value of True and is passed to the superclass. A similar change is made in the fitting_property function in the argcheck module, along with corresponding documentation updates and the necessary import adjustments.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
deepmd/pt/.../property.py
deepmd/utils/argcheck.py
Added new trainable parameter (type: Union[bool, list[bool]], default: True) to both the PropertyFittingNet constructor and the fitting_property function. Updated documentation to clarify its behavior, especially when provided as a list, and added necessary import for Union.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • njzjz
  • iProzd
  • wanghan-iapcm

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 176c746 and 46de84c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • deepmd/pt/model/task/property.py (3 hunks)
  • deepmd/utils/argcheck.py (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (20)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (6, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (6, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (5, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (5, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (4, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp310-manylinux_aarch64
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (4, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (3, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (clang, clang)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (3, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-macosx_x86_64
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (2, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (2, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-manylinux_x86_64
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (1, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test C++ (false)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (c-cpp)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (1, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test C++ (true)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
deepmd/pt/model/task/property.py (1)

92-92: LGTM! The trainable parameter is properly implemented.

The new trainable parameter is well-defined with proper typing and a sensible default value. The parameter is correctly passed to the superclass.

Also applies to: 112-112

deepmd/utils/argcheck.py (1)

1583-1585: LGTM! The argument definition and documentation are well-implemented.

The trainable parameter is properly defined with:

  • Clear documentation explaining both boolean and list options
  • Correct typing as [list[bool], bool]
  • Appropriate default value matching the implementation

Also applies to: 1622-1628

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.57%. Comparing base (176c746) to head (46de84c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #4599      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.58%   84.57%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         680      680              
  Lines       64509    64509              
  Branches     3540     3539       -1     
==========================================
- Hits        54562    54561       -1     
+ Misses       8807     8806       -1     
- Partials     1140     1142       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 17, 2025
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit c0cadf5 Feb 17, 2025
60 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants