Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: document more for multiprocessing #4190

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Oct 7, 2024

Fix #4182.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated lammps-command.md to clarify GPU usage and unit handling in LAMMPS.
    • Enhanced howtoset_num_nodes.md with new sections on MPI and multiprocessing for TensorFlow and PyTorch, improving clarity and usability.
    • Added guidance on GPU resource allocation for parallel processes.

@njzjz njzjz linked an issue Oct 7, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Docs label Oct 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 7, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to two documentation files: lammps-command.md and howtoset_num_nodes.md. The changes in lammps-command.md clarify GPU usage and unit handling in LAMMPS simulations, while howtoset_num_nodes.md enhances the explanation of parallelism options, specifically addressing MPI and multiprocessing for TensorFlow and PyTorch. Both documents emphasize the limitation of one GPU per process and provide structured guidance on resource allocation and configuration.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
doc/third-party/lammps-command.md Added notes on GPU usage and unit handling; emphasized single GPU per MPI rank; referenced troubleshooting guide.
doc/troubleshooting/howtoset_num_nodes.md Updated section header for MPI; added subsections for TensorFlow and PyTorch; clarified GPU usage per process.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Address GPU memory issues during LAMMPS execution (4182)

Possibly related PRs

  • docs: improve multi-backend documentation #3875: The changes in doc/troubleshooting/howtoset_num_nodes.md regarding GPU usage and parallelism options are related to the updates in doc/third-party/lammps-command.md, which also discusses GPU utilization and parallelism in LAMMPS.
  • chore: bump LAMMPS to stable_29Aug2024_update1 #4179: The updates in doc/third-party/lammps-command.md regarding the pair_style deepmd command are directly related to the changes made in this PR, which also involves modifications to LAMMPS documentation.

Suggested labels

Docs

Suggested reviewers

  • wanghan-iapcm

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
doc/troubleshooting/howtoset_num_nodes.md (4)

13-17: Great addition of TensorFlow-specific instructions!

The new content clearly explains how to enable MPI support for TensorFlow, which is crucial for users implementing parallel processing. The link to Horovod installation instructions is particularly helpful.

Consider adding a brief example command or code snippet demonstrating how to use Horovod with DeePMD-kit for TensorFlow users. This could further enhance the practical value of this section.


18-22: Good addition of PyTorch-specific information, but could be enhanced.

The inclusion of PyTorch-specific multiprocessing information using torchrun is valuable. However, this section could benefit from more detailed instructions or examples, similar to the TensorFlow section.

Consider expanding this section to include:

  1. A brief example of how to use torchrun with DeePMD-kit.
  2. Any specific configuration options or best practices for PyTorch multiprocessing in the context of DeePMD-kit.

This would provide more actionable information for PyTorch users and maintain consistency with the level of detail in the TensorFlow section.


40-40: Excellent addition of GPU usage limitation!

This crucial note directly addresses the GPU memory issue mentioned in the linked issue #4182. It provides clear guidance on resource allocation, which is essential for users to avoid memory exhaustion errors.

To further enhance this section, consider adding a brief explanation of why this limitation exists and how it relates to the GPU memory issues some users might encounter. This could help users better understand the underlying reasons for this constraint and how to work within it effectively.


Line range hint 1-40: Excellent overall improvements to parallelism documentation!

The document now provides a comprehensive guide to parallelism in DeePMD-kit, covering MPI/multiprocessing, inter-operator parallelism, and intra-operator parallelism. The additions and changes align well with the PR objective of improving documentation for multiprocessing and addressing the GPU memory issue.

To further enhance the document's usefulness:

  1. Consider adding a troubleshooting section that directly addresses common issues, such as the GPU memory problem mentioned in issue GPU memory issue while executing lmp #4182. This could include symptoms, potential causes, and solutions.
  2. It might be beneficial to include a decision tree or flowchart to help users determine which parallelism approach is best for their specific use case and hardware configuration.

These additions would make the document even more valuable as a comprehensive resource for users dealing with parallelism and resource allocation in DeePMD-kit.

doc/third-party/lammps-command.md (2)

7-10: Excellent addition addressing GPU usage limitations.

This note directly addresses the GPU memory issue mentioned in the linked issue #4182. It provides crucial information for users to understand the limitations of GPU usage with MPI ranks.

Consider adding a brief explanation of why this limitation exists (e.g., "due to the current implementation of DeePMD-kit") to provide more context for users.


Line range hint 13-25: Consider enhancing the "units" section for clarity.

While the current changes effectively address the GPU memory issue, there's an opportunity to further clarify the relationship between units and GPU memory usage. This could help users better understand how their choice of units might impact memory allocation.

Consider adding a note in the "units" section that explains how different unit choices might affect memory usage, especially in the context of GPU calculations. For example:
"Note: The choice of units can indirectly affect GPU memory usage. Certain unit systems may lead to larger or smaller numeric values, potentially impacting the memory required for calculations. When working with limited GPU memory, consider how your choice of units might influence overall memory consumption."

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2feb21c and cd95b73.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • doc/third-party/lammps-command.md (1 hunks)
  • doc/troubleshooting/howtoset_num_nodes.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
doc/troubleshooting/howtoset_num_nodes.md (1)

7-13: Excellent update to the MPI section!

The changes in this section effectively address the PR objective of improving documentation for multiprocessing. The updated header and introduction clearly indicate that both MPI and multiprocessing are options for parallelism. The new tab set structure promises a more organized presentation of framework-specific information.

doc/third-party/lammps-command.md (2)

11-11: Improved readability with added spacing.

The addition of an empty line after the new note enhances the document's readability by clearly separating sections.


Line range hint 1-391: Overall, excellent documentation update addressing GPU usage.

This update effectively addresses the GPU memory issue mentioned in the linked issue #4182 by adding crucial information about MPI rank and GPU usage limitations. The changes are well-integrated into the existing documentation and maintain consistency in style and formatting.

The added note and reference to the troubleshooting guide provide valuable information for users encountering GPU memory issues. The suggested minor enhancements, if implemented, would further improve the document's clarity and usefulness.

Great job on this documentation update!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.46%. Comparing base (2feb21c) to head (cd95b73).
Report is 3 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #4190      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.45%   83.46%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         537      537              
  Lines       52148    52224      +76     
  Branches     3047     3047              
==========================================
+ Hits        43518    43590      +72     
- Misses       7683     7689       +6     
+ Partials      947      945       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@njzjz njzjz closed this Oct 7, 2024
@njzjz njzjz reopened this Oct 7, 2024
@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 8, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit b807bb4 Oct 8, 2024
117 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

GPU memory issue while executing lmp
2 participants