Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refact: compute_output_stats and change_out_bias #3639

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 3, 2024

Conversation

wanghan-iapcm
Copy link
Collaborator

  • clean up the interface of change_out_bias
  • refact compute_output_stats, so the code is more readable.

deepmd/pt/train/training.py Fixed Show fixed Hide fixed
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.72%. Comparing base (8e0cc90) to head (0cc9fe1).
Report is 4 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #3639      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.80%   81.72%   +3.92%     
==========================================
  Files         438      503      +65     
  Lines       37707    46007    +8300     
  Branches     1623     2892    +1269     
==========================================
+ Hits        29337    37600    +8263     
- Misses       7506     7529      +23     
- Partials      864      878      +14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm changed the title Refact compute_output_stats and change_out_bias refact: compute_output_stats and change_out_bias Apr 3, 2024
@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit 073f559 Apr 3, 2024
49 checks passed
@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm deleted the refact-output-stat branch April 3, 2024 04:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants