Skip to content

Issues: decentralized-identity/didwebvh

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

26 Open 53 Closed
26 Open 53 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Should this method have an easy solution to "Right to be forgotten"?
#161 opened Dec 19, 2024 by brianorwhatever
1
Replace JSON Lines with JSON to simplify implementation, improve processing speed, and enhance extensibility
#160 opened Dec 13, 2024 by filip26
What should be in the spec to support a Resolver Client verifying signatures using "old" keys
#153 opened Dec 6, 2024 by swcurran
16
Update the data structure and what is signed by witness proofs
#152 opened Dec 6, 2024 by swcurran
1
Should we support turning off pre-rotation and if so, how
#151 opened Dec 6, 2024 by swcurran
13
Specify requirements on witness key types
#149 opened Dec 4, 2024 by andrewwhitehead
Should we add the requirement that the DIDDoc be processed in a DIDDoc Linter in the spec?
#145 opened Nov 30, 2024 by swcurran
1
Adjust the did-witness.json file to minimize the number of proofs
#144 opened Nov 29, 2024 by swcurran
Does it make sense to only keep the proofs about the two most recent log update entries?
#143 opened Nov 29, 2024 by swcurran
2
Is it sufficient for a witness to sign only the versionId of the entry?
#142 opened Nov 29, 2024 by swcurran
1
Is the spec clear on how a valid witness proof applies to earlier versions?
#141 opened Nov 29, 2024 by swcurran
Should we allow disabling a witness
#140 opened Nov 29, 2024 by swcurran
4 tasks
2
New approach to recording/publishing Witnesses
#135 opened Nov 22, 2024 by swcurran
@swcurran
2
Should the spec have an opinion on the use of "old keys" and their use for verification
#134 opened Nov 22, 2024 by swcurran
Further clarification on (partial) resolution
#131 opened Nov 14, 2024 by andrewwhitehead
1
OIDC compatibility — Self-Issued OpenID Provider
#128 opened Nov 9, 2024 by erlend-sh
1
final proofPurpose
#125 opened Oct 25, 2024 by brianorwhatever
Consider how DID Linked Resources might be used in did:webvh
#107 opened Sep 14, 2024 by swcurran
2
Create a did:webvh test suite
#87 opened Aug 2, 2024 by swcurran
Add a section to the specification of how did:tdw can be used with the High Assurance DIDs Specification
#78 opened Jul 19, 2024 by swcurran
2
Add section to specification about not trusting a DID based on verification alone
#73 opened Jul 17, 2024 by swcurran
1
Is there a way/convention for transitioning an existing did:web DID to be a did:tdw DID?
#68 opened Jul 9, 2024 by swcurran
2
Extract SCID section to a standalone spec?
#54 opened May 5, 2024 by dmitrizagidulin
4
Implementor Guidance: Publishing AnonCreds objects using did:webvh
#51 opened Apr 29, 2024 by swcurran
@andrewwhitehead
1
Additional resolver metadata discuss Let's talk about this at our next meeting
#43 opened Apr 11, 2024 by andrewwhitehead
1
ProTip! Find all open issues with in progress development work with linked:pr.