-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New UI for this project #188
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
create /tmp in container fixes ddvk#182
So here are some things: |
Thanks for your advice. "the ui shows the main/documet page without the user being logged in", The user will redirect to login page if he is not authorized. I implement authentication by API invocation, it can't work without a running backend. Could you describe more about sync15 implementation?
|
sync15 is a new version of the sync. it uses less bandwidth and allows for 2way sync. there is a client implementation in rmapi. |
Hi, @ddvk I have implemented the API for the sync15 backend except for the API for removing documentation. I want to implement it like the below: Updates value of the property "delete" of blob documentation's metadata to true, then wait device to sync to remove documentation actually. Can the implementation work properly? It's pleasure to have your advice. |
I also added the whole sync15 ui apis, let me see how we can merge them |
Ok, I add a new feature to the new UI, it now show different icon by document's type. |
|
||
if dirty { | ||
backend.Sync(uid) | ||
log.Info(uiLogger, "document updated: id=", docid) |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Log entries created from user input
err := backend.DeleteDocument(uid, docId) | ||
|
||
if err != nil { | ||
log.Error("Delete document error: ", err) |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Log entries created from user input
doc, err := backend.CreateFolder(uid, req.Name, req.ParentID) | ||
|
||
if err != nil { | ||
log.Error(err) |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Log entries created from user input
Hi, I do some efforts to fix These potential problems found by the github-code-scanning bot could be a false positive report, do these have to be fixed? |
I gave this new UI a try recently and just wanted to say: nice job. Haven't found any issues, uploading and organizing documents all worked smoothly. Great contribution, thanks @zgs225 ! |
yes, the codeql are false positive. |
@Gamer92000 it's on my todo list. i'll even fix the conflict, but haven't had time |
Sounds good! 👍 Dann wünsche ich noch einen schönen Rest-Stephanstag :P |
Any update on this? I'd like to use this new shiny UI. It seems to be a great improvement in usability. |
I appreciate your interest in the new UI. I want to assure you that I will make an effort to continue working on it, but I cannot guarantee a specific timeframe for its completion. |
Hey everyone! I have a pull request against the fork to merge the latest changes and get this PR back up and running! Mentioning here for awareness! |
Hi, I'm working on a new UI for this project. It has several imporvements compares to the original UI. There's a website to preview, you can login in with
demo/demo
.Improvement:
Screenshot:
This branch is still in progress: