-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposed namespace for OpenWEMI #126
Comments
Do you prefer I'd recommend (And I'd say these gritty technical details are the price we pay for the immensely added value of dereferenceable logical names.) |
|
Schema.org was http and moved to https. I don't recall the technical
details. But there was some engineering to forward things along from http
to https. maybe DCMI could do the same for the older vocabularies.
- Hugh
…On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:30 AM Phil Barker ***@***.***> wrote:
https: makes sense. I nearly suggested it in the working group but then I
noticed that every other DCMI vocab uses http: (the price we pay for DCMI
being almost as old as the web).
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#126 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAJ2JQLYOT64ABLQQM2P6TY7INCDAVCNFSM6AAAAABGZBGAOKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANZZGAYDENJUGA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
I honestly don't care. It should be whatever DCMI thinks is best. |
After discussion, it is clear that the PURL.ORG service is less desirable because DCMI does not have direct control over the service. It is being suggested that DCMI take direct responsibility for its own persistent identifiers going forward, under the dublincore.org domain. The proposed persistent namespace for OpenWEMI is |
Just thoughts from the side line, re.:
I have gone through this with gndo : A point to consider is that every existing sparql query is obsoleted by a changing a namespace uri, even if only the protocol changed. Neither redirects nor owl:sameAs statements (or similar) in the published vocabulary help in case of queries (which are often buried deeply in scripts, and now silently produce empty results). Published 3rd party data would either use the old or the new protocol/base URI, which would add to the mess. So while the proposed namespace for openwemi in #126 (comment) looks fine, I wouldn't recommend changing namespaces for older vocabularies without pressing need. |
We suggest this public namespace for OpenWEMI.
URI: http://purl.org/dcx/openwemi/
This is parallel to the namespace that was developed for LRMI. The local IRI can be:
https://www.dublincore.org/dcx/openwemi/(date)
The date will be the latest edit date. We expect the OpenWEMI vocabulary to be stable once it is approved.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: