Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

With typeshed coming to Jedi, builtin modules should be displayed #915

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 22, 2019

Conversation

davidhalter
Copy link
Owner

(If there's a module_path, which most will have)

This change is still backwards compatible and can be used with older Jedi
versions (<0.14.0).

We can merge this now or later. IMO it's good to merge now, because it won't really change the behavior AFAIK.

(If there's a module_path (which most will have)).

This change is still backwards compatible and can be used with older Jedi
versions (<0.14.0).
@blueyed
Copy link
Collaborator

blueyed commented Mar 9, 2019

I trust you on this, but tests need to be fixed.

@davidhalter
Copy link
Owner Author

I think the major change is that there's now a <leader>s command that goes to stubs.

Please review and maybe test. We can then merge. Pretty sure it works.

@davidhalter
Copy link
Owner Author

BTW: I'm a bit unsure about the test failures. If you have any idea, I'm interested.

str has different signatures for Python 2 and 3 and is therefore annoying to test.
@davidhalter
Copy link
Owner Author

Tests are passing now. I feel like I finally fixed it.

@davidhalter davidhalter requested a review from blueyed June 21, 2019 21:42
@blueyed
Copy link
Collaborator

blueyed commented Jun 22, 2019

Awesome!
Checked this out locally now and will test-drive it.

@davidhalter
Copy link
Owner Author

davidhalter commented Jun 22, 2019

Not sure what you intend to do now. Are you merging once you tested it for a bit? Or was your idea that I merge it?

@blueyed
Copy link
Collaborator

blueyed commented Jun 22, 2019

Feel free to merge it already (the approval is based on reviewing).
I've not tested it much yet, but changes to jedi-vim are minor, and I've used updated jedi/parso before, so that's fine.

@davidhalter
Copy link
Owner Author

Merging, worst case we revert.

@davidhalter davidhalter merged commit 016fb7c into master Jun 22, 2019
@davidhalter davidhalter deleted the typeshed branch June 23, 2019 22:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants