-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP: update multi-tenacy docs #1
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
docs/book/src/topics/multitenancy.md
Outdated
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ For details, see the [multi-tenancy proposal](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs | |||
|
|||
For multi-tenancy support, a reference field (`identityRef`) is added to `AWSCluster`, which describes the identity to be used when reconciling the cluster. | |||
|
|||
In other words, `identityRef`is the function that dictates _which_ aws account cluster-api will deploy into. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe this might be redundant, the identityRef
has nothing to do with the account per se, and the paragraph at line 24 clarify what is this about.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand the point you're making. I think while it may be redundant, it states an important part of the multi-tenancy configuration. Which is how an operator dictates which cluster they can deploy into.
I'd like to leave something high level explaining this at the top of the doc, do you have any suggestions for wording?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You could say something like:
identityRef
reference the credentials or the role that the capa-controller will use to manage the relative cluster
But then we are, sort of, repeating what's in the previous paragraph
Aside from the comment above, LGTM |
6cf67b8
to
64d6f82
Compare
typo CR feedback
1b05e5c
to
4048a8d
Compare
This PR updates the
multi-tenancy
section to provide:/kind documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Checklist:
Release note: