-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Integration tests executed on a real deployment as part of the CICD - Redshift Shares #1620
Comments
dlpzx
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 22, 2024
… Redshift Shares (#1643)⚠️ MERGE AFTER #1636 ### Feature or Bugfix - Feature: Testing ### Detail Add integration tests for Redshift shares. Implements #1620 - Implemented inside the shares modules in a subdirectory so that each share type can have its own conftest but still re-use common methods from shares queries - This PR is focused on testing the Redshift shares functionality, it does not include all tests that test the workflow of the share (e.g. submit, reject...) - It does not validate if after a share the user has access to data. We could implement it using the Redshift Data API, but I left it as optional for a separate PR ### Tested Locally: ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3a2acc79-d025-483f-949b-23e31b23d26e) ### Relates - #1620 - #1619 - #1220 ### Security Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write `N/A`. Based on [OWASP 10](https://owasp.org/Top10/en/). - Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this includes fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an S3 bucket)? - Is the input sanitized? - What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you consume? - Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries? - Have you ensured no `eval` or similar functions are used? - Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires authorization? - How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms? - Are you logging failed auth attempts? - Are you using or adding any cryptographic features? - Do you use a standard proven implementations? - Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored? - Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users? - Have you used the least-privilege principle? How? By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
dlpzx
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 25, 2024
### Feature or Bugfix - Bugfix ### Detail Add CREATE_SHARE_OBJECT to group 5 invited to session_env1 in integration test. Needed to test the integration tests of Redshift ### Relates - #1620 ### Security Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write `N/A`. Based on [OWASP 10](https://owasp.org/Top10/en/). - Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this includes fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an S3 bucket)? - Is the input sanitized? - What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you consume? - Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries? - Have you ensured no `eval` or similar functions are used? - Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires authorization? - How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms? - Are you logging failed auth attempts? - Are you using or adding any cryptographic features? - Do you use a standard proven implementations? - Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored? - Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users? - Have you used the least-privilege principle? How? By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Same as for #1220.
This issue is to track the progress for the Redshift Dataset SHARING module.
It has its own dedicated issue because of the challenge of validating the infrastructure of Redshift
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: